Mindless Vaccination Bureaucracy
By Michael Belkin
My daughter Lyla Rose Belkin died on September 16, 1998 at the age of five weeks, shortly
after receiving a Hepatitis B vaccine booster shot. The following comments are intended to
be a heads up to parents and potential parents about the risks of the Hepatitis B vaccine
(HBV), and a firsthand report questioning the scientific legitimacy of the vaccine
industry, which provides $800 million of annual revenue to Merck the company which
makes the Hepatitis B vaccine distributed in the US.
Lyla Rose Belkin was a lively, alert five-week-old baby when I last held her in my arms.
Little did I imagine as she gazed intently into my eyes with all the innocence and wonder
of a newborn child that she would die that night. She was never ill before receiving the
Hepatitis B shot that afternoon. At her final feeding that night, she was agitated and
feisty -- and then fell asleep and didnt wake up.
The autopsy ruled out choking. A swollen brain was the only abnormal finding. Most doctors
I spoke to at the time said it must have been Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS), a
catch-all diagnosis for unexplainable
childhood mortality.
The first instinctive reaction in such a situation is for parents to blame themselves. For
many weeks, my wife and I agonized over what we might have missed or could have done
differently. Meanwhile, the logical part of my brain kept returning to the obvious medical
event that preceded Lylas death -- and that internal voice kept asking the question
could the Hepatitis B Vaccine that Lyla received that afternoon have killed her?
Most doctors I asked scoffed at that notion and said the vaccine was perfectly safe. But I
began to search around on the Internet and Medline and discovered disturbing evidence of
adverse reactions to this vaccine.
In the US, the Hepatitis B disease mainly infects intravenous drug users, homosexuals,
prostitutes and promiscuous heterosexuals. The disease is transmitted by blood, through
sex or dirty needles. How could a newborn baby possibly get Hepatitis B if the mother was
screened and tested negative, as my wife was? It is almost impossible. Unless a newborn
child is having unprotected sex or sharing needles with an infected junkie, it is
extremely unlikely to get the Hepatitis B disease.
So then why are most US babies inoculated at birth by their Hospital or Pediatrician with
the Hepatitis B vaccine? That is a question every parent should ask before getting this
vaccination. Ive discovered the answer is-- an unrestrained health bureaucracy
decided it couldnt get junkies, gays, prostitutes and promiscuous heterosexuals to
take the Hepatitis B vaccine -- so they mandated that all babies must be vaccinated at
birth.
Drug companies such as Merck (reaching for new markets) were instrumental in pushing
government scientists to adopt an at-birth Hepatitis B vaccination policy, although the
vaccine was never tested in newborns and
no vaccines had ever been mandated at birth before. It is widely recognized that newborns
have under-developed immune systems, which can be overwhelmed or shocked.
My search for answers about a link between the Hepatitis B vaccine and my daughters
death led me to a Hepatitis B vaccine workshop on October 26th at the National Academy of
Sciences (NAS), Institute of Medicine entitled Vaccine Safety Forum -- Neonatal Deaths.
The NAS was concerned enough about
reports of Hepatitis B vaccine-related infant deaths and adverse reactions to hold a
special workshop on the subject. Doctors and scientists flew in from all over the US and
Europe to attend. I sat in the back and soaked it
all up. It was a real eye-opener. There were basically four constituencies represented: 1)
Serious scientists observing or presenting research studies. 2) Center for Disease Control
(CDC) pseudo-statisticians and FDA
officials. 3) Merck and other corporate drug officials and 4) Parents of vaccine-related
dead or severely injured children.
The presentations included a study of Animal Models of Newborn Response to Antigen
Presentation, which showed that newborn immune systems were undeveloped and strikingly
different than those of adults. The message I received was that immune response in a
newborn to shocks such as being injected with a vaccine was potentially unknown, since
newborn T-Cells have a radically different behavior then those of adults. Another
presentation was Strategies for Evaluating the Biologic Mechanisms of Hepatitis B Vaccine
Reactions, in which vaccine researcher Dr. Bonnie Dunbar of Baylor College related
numerous Hepatitis B vaccine related cases of nervous system damage in adults, such as
Multiple Sclerosis, seizures and blindness. On the more positive side, the FDA presented a
seemingly reassuring study from its Vaccine Adverse Effects Reporting System (VAERS),
which showed only 19 neonatal deaths reported since 1991 related to Hepatitis B
vaccination.
I found the VAERS study data to be completely deceptive. Since I was sitting in that room
and my daughter had died during their sample period and wasnt counted -- I wondered
why. In fact, the New York City Coroner
called VAERS to report my daughters Hepatitis B vaccine related infant death and no
one ever returned their call! What kind of reporting system doesnt return the calls
of the NY City Medical Examiner -- and how many
other reports were ignored? This is supposed to be the emergency 911 number for disasters
such as bad lots of vaccine that could poison thousands of other babies. With the personal
knowledge that the VAERS data was
completely flawed, I sat in that room and listened in amazement as CDC officials and
Mercks head of vaccine safety made disparaging comments about any possible risk from
Hepatitis B vaccination, despite the evidence
just presented by impartial scientists.
I studied statistics and econometrics at UC Berkeley and have developed innovative methods
of applying probability to financial and economic data in my consulting business with some
of the largest financial institutions in the world. That training and experience qualifies
me to criticize the statistical legitimacy of the VAERS study, on which Merck and the CDC
pseudo-scientists based their pro-vaccination stance. Their comments were scathingly
dismissive of any possible risk from the vaccine.
But that VAERS study is not a legitimate sample of a data set from which any conclusions
about the larger population can be made. VAERS doesnt return coroners calls,
leading to the suspicion that deaths and adverse effects from vaccination are woefully
under-reported. To conclude that the Hepatitis B vaccine is safe because VAERS only
reports 19 deaths is scientific fraud.
In fact, I obtained the raw data from the VAERS system and found 54 reported SIDS cases
after Hepatitis B vaccination in just the 18 months from January 1996 -- May 1997.
Thats almost 15 times as many deaths per
year as their own flawed study reported. There are 17,000 reports of adverse reactions to
Hepatitis B vaccine in the 1996-97 raw data. Clearly something is fishy about VAERS.
VAERS was set up by the FDA and CDC. If there are 17,000 reports and VAERS doesnt
even return the NY Medical Examiners call, how many other deaths and injuries go
unreported?
I came away from that NAS workshop with the distinct impression that Merck and the CDC
didnt know and didnt really want to know how many babies are being killed or
injured by Hepatitis B vaccination. This is a bureaucratic vaccination program that is on
auto-pilot flying into a mountain.
The CDC bureaucrats have a vested interest in the status quo. If there were 17,000 reports
of a dangerous disease in an 18-month period, the CDC would be all over the case. But when
there are 17,000 reports of adverse reactions to a vaccine the CDC advocates for
"public health" -- the CDC dismisses it as a coincidence. Merck makes $50 a shot
from the three-shot series and has sales of upwards of $800 million a year from vaccines.
Vaccination can be a lifesaver if an epidemic is raging, but in this case the risk of
vaccination outweighs the risk of infants getting the disease. Surely, the hepatitis B
vaccine doesnt injure every child that gets it, but in some unknown number of cases,
it appears to be a death sentence and/or a nervous system toxin to innocent children who
are at no risk of getting the disease the vaccine is supposed to protect against.
My observations of Merck and CDC scientists at the Vaccine Safety Forum left me with the
distinct impression that they had absolutely no idea which babies might be killed or
injured by this vaccine. Furthermore, they used
obviously flawed scientific data to arrogantly steamroller any opposition to their power.
Parents should be aware that the Hepatitis B vaccine is not administered for the well
being of their child. Rather, it is delivered by the long arm of some incompetent and
mindless bureaucracy in the name of stamping out a
disease most babies cant possibly get.
The Drug Company/CDC/FDA alliance has really pulled the wool over the medical
professions eyes with the Hepatitis B vaccine. The American Academy of Pediatrics
bought the alliances sales pitch and now recommends that all infants get this
vaccine at birth. So now the first thing most babies get in life is a shock to their
immune system from a vaccine against a non-existent risk of contracting Hepatitis B.
Clearly, the interests of newborn babies were not represented on the CDC panel that
created this vaccination policy in 1991. This vaccine has no benefit whatsoever for
healthy newborns born to healthy mothers, in fact it
wears off and they will need booster shots later in life when they actually could get
exposed to the disease. This is simply a case of ravenous corporate greed and mindless
bureaucracy teaming up to overwhelm common sense.
Nothing will ever bring my lovely daughter Lyla back, but other needless deaths and
injuries can be prevented if this senseless Hepatitis B newborn vaccination program is
halted.
