|
|
|
The Case of Janet Burton vs. Steven Hutchinson
For Immediate Release: November 10, 2004Arizona judge amends parenting plan, orders vaccinationsCan a judge be unbiased when forced to rule whether or not his own order caused permanent injury to children? By Don Harkins In their efforts to protect two children from family court-ordered vaccinations, Janet and John Burton of Tempe, Arizona, find themselves at center stage in a precedent-setting child custody case. At issue is plaintiff/parent Steven Hutchinson seeking a court order awarding him full custody of two children based on the mother's insistence that they be lawfully exempted from vaccination. This case is exemplary of a national trend where hundreds, possibly thousands of divorced parents are punished by the state because their ex-spouses choose to use the vaccination issue as a means to gain the custodial upper hand. In many cases, as in the Burton case, one parent may be on record as agreeing with the other parent's non-vaccination position but changes their mind to enlist the court's help in undermining the other's access to the children. Arizona District Judge Larry Grant of Maricopa county has ignored the Burton's evidence regarding the dangers of vaccines and upheld Hutchinson's desire that five-year-old Greyson and seven-year-old Gwyneth be vaccinated. Judge Grant further defied Janet's well-founded concerns by ordering that Hutchinson may determine what vaccines his children will receive and choose the practitioner who will deliver them. Judge Grant's order was carried out May 12, 2004. The children were, ...physically restrained and forcefully vaccinated by a reckless, unprofessional 'health practitioner' who administered to them 21 vaccines in less than an hour. This 'kiddie cocktail' of mercury, aluminum, pathogenic viruses and more may have changed the course of my children's lives forever, Janet Burton explained. Neither Hutchinson nor Judge Grant are licensed to prescribe medication in Arizona or any other state. However, armed with Judge Grant's court order, Hutchinson prescribed seven shots (DTaP, IPV, MMR, Hib, Hep B, Varicella and PCVfor a total of 21 vaccines) each for his children. According to the Centers for Disease Control and its catch-up schedule, Gwyneth and Greyson should not have received the Hib and PCV shots because they were both past the age of five years. The osteopath Hutchinson used (who is licensed to prescribe medicines) administered the contraindicated vaccines per the judge's order. Arizona VacLib Chapter Director Kim Medlin has conducted further research into the vaccines administered to Gwyneth and Greyson on May 12. Medlin has found that four of them came from what are called hot lotsbatches of vaccines known to be causing unusually high numbers of adverse reactions. One of the vaccines is known to be contaminated with bovine spongiform encephalitisalso known as mad cow disease. The Burtons have noticed that Gwyneth and Greyson's personalities have changed since the severe assault of 21 vaccines May 12 and that they are both more sickly. Janet believes the court is getting ready to order that her children be subjected to another round of vaccinations. Several qualified physicians have commented that the first round of vaccinations appear to have caused damage to these two children and concur that additional vaccinations at this time would do more harm than good. Since this case was initiated by Hutchinson last March, Janet has forced the court to review much evidence regarding the dangers of vaccines. They have also enlisted the support of Drs. Muhammad Al-Bayati, Russell Blaylock and William Rae. Judge Grant has demonstrated that he has considered the information provided by Janet when stating for the record that he could not support their position because it would be an admission that, by recommending and ordering vaccines as a policy, the state of Arizona has been engaging in child abuse for decades. The evidence supports Janet's claims that Hutchinson's actions are purely vindictive and that he is using his children to punish his former wife for divorcing him last year. This is the same man that just a few years ago sat me down in front of a computer monitor and proceeded to navigate around various websites in an effort to educate me on the hidden truths about all the risks and cover-ups associated with the 'experimental' surgical procedure we all loosely refer to today as childhood immunizations. Of course, as informed, responsible co-parents, we jointly agreed not to vaccinate our children. We made this decision and many other decisions such as birthing our children at home, breastfeeding each baby for a full year and a half and following up with a healthy, organic food plan thereafter. We also agreed that no pharmaceutical medications were to be given and, for certain, we would not mindlessly entrust our children to ignorant, drug-pushing doctors. All of these decisions seemed to serve our two children well as they truly epitomized wellness, vitality and brilliance. Both their father and I were proud of the positions we had taken on issues that pertained to our children's health and well-being and agreed to continue with what had worked (holistic methods of treatment) for our perfect children when we divorced. Together we outlined our beliefs concerning alternative methods of treatment for our children and made this part of our Parenting Planwhich is on file with the courts to this very day, Janet explained. Among the documents before Judge Grant are reports of increased risk of adverse reactions in children who receive multiple antigens and letters stating that Gwyneth and Greyson are showing signs of vaccine damage. The Burton's attorney Wallace Nichols is orchestrating a legal strategy intended to spare Gwyneth and Greyson another round of court-ordered vaccinations. In the process of this child custody case being decided by Judge Grant, the court will be forced to consider the validity of state-recommended vaccination schedules against published science and the expert testimony of qualified neuroscientists, pathologists and medical doctors. And, if the Burtons are able to arrange for her children to undergo a full medical and biochemical analysis by Dr. Rae at the Environmental Health Center in Dallas (EHCD), Judge Grant will be forced to consider the possibility that vaccinations he ordered to appease the wishes of a man seeking retribution on his former spouse have caused two innocent children to suffer permanent injury. The move will also force Hutchinson to legally trump the Burton's medical evidence of vaccine damage by entering into the record an expert second opinion contradicting the findings of Dr. Rae's EHCD. Burton supporters believe Hutchinson will not be able to discredit the pending EHCD report. I will take this case as far as it will go, commented Janet who understands the huge implications this case will have in child custody disputes all over the nation. The EHCD and the work of Dr. Rae in the field of environmental toxicology has come highly recommended by Dr. Sherri Tenpenny and others. The cost for the series of tests to be run on both children is estimated at $3,000. Supporters are willing to supply room and board for the Burtons during the four days they will be in Dallas. The Burtons can use our help in this matter as attorney fees and lost wages are causing them to experience a significant degree of financial hardship. Dr. Rae and the staff at EHCD have excellent credentials and utilize state-of-the-art diagnostic equipment and procedures to arrive at scientifically sound conclusions that stand up in court. To find out more about EHCD, the services it offers and references, go to www.ehcd.com Vaccination Liberation, a national grassroots volunteer association, sees the huge implications of this case and has forwarded a $100 donation to the Burtons to help cover the cost of testing. Vaccination Liberation also requests that medical practitioners nationwide match their donation to this worthy cause. October 27-2004 My name is Janet Burton and I am the mother of 4 precious children ranging from 5 to 22yrs. of age. My husband John and I have been fighting for over 7 months with the Father of my two youngest children AND the Family Court division of the Maricopa County Superior Court here in Phoenix, Arizona. On May 12, 2004, both my 5 yr. old son, Greyson and my 7 yr. old daughter, Gwyneth were physically restrained and forcefully vaccinated (at the mercy of a reckless, unprofessional 'health practioner) with 11 vaccines in one event. This 'kiddie cocktail of mercury, aluminum and more may have forevermore changed the course of my children's lives. The decision to vaccinate my little ones has been played out in Family Court since March of this year. The litigations surrounding this sensitive issue arose because my children's Father chose to make our beautiful, innocent son and daughter the weapons in which to deliver a painful and promised blow to me personally for my decision to divorce him the year before. This is the same man that just a few years ago sat me down in front of a computer monitor and proceeded to navigate around various websites in an effort to educate me on the hidden truths about all the risks and cover- ups associated with the 'experimental' surgical procedure we all loosely refer to today as childhood immunizations. Of course, as informed, responsible co-parents, we jointly agreed not to vaccinate our children. We made this decision and many other decisions such as... birthing our children at home, breast feeding each baby for a full year and a half and following up with a healthy, organic food plan thereafter, no medications would be given, and for certain ... we would not mindlessly entrust our children to ignorant, drug pushing doctors. All of these decisions seemed to serve our children well as we had raised a little boy and a little girl that truly epitomized wellness, vitality and brilliance. Both their Father and I were proud of the positions we had taken on issues that pertained to our children's health and well being and agreed to continue with what had worked (holistic methods of treatment) for our perfect children when we divorced. Together we outlined our beliefs concerning alternative methods of treatment only for our children and made this a part of our Parenting Plan on file with the courts to this very day. In March, Father's legal counsel announced to the court that his client had a recent change of heart regarding the subject matter of childhood vaccinations. They asked the judicial 'System' to assist Father in carrying out an act that could be construed as nothing short of child abuse. And so they did. With nearly $30,000 spent on legal fees and with considerable local media coverage, Father prevailed and was given the opportunity to vaccinate the children with the vaccines of his choice by the health care provider of his choice. This decision was based on what a judge proclaimed to be a 'Public Policy in the state of Arizona to vaccinate all children. The judge also stated that to rule otherwise would be to admit our government has committed child abuse for decades. If the truth be known, that is exactly what our government has done!!! With a newly obtained Order in hand - accompanied by 3 police cars - Father and a female accomplice whisked my children away from their school campus and drove them to a nearby emergency health care clinic. Father tricked my children to go inside with him, telling them that they were going in for their first check up - nothing more, nothing less. Once inside, Father along with a woman posing as my children's mother, authorized a health practioner (DO) to administer a 'cocktail' of poison into Greyson and Gwyneth's pure blood stream. This cocktail contained the DTaP, IPV, MMR, Hib, Hep B, Varicella and PCV vaccines that were given to both children all at once. These vaccines were recklessly combined and adding insult to injury, two of the vaccines were age inappropriate - one that is from a contaminated lot now known to carry the Mad Cow disease. Virtually no consideration was given to G1 and G2's medical family history, which includes a first-degree family member (half-sister) who suffered from grand mal seizures for four years after being vaccinated with the MMR vaccine. This family history of seizures puts both pf my children at a much greater risk of experiencing seizures than the general population. It is beyond comprehension to me the reasons and the lengths to which a few unqualified and grossly misguided people have gone to force all this upon my children - literally gambling with their lives. And for what?!!!! For nothing!!! My 5 and nearly 7 yr. old son and daughter, who are well past the ages of life threatening consequences from any diseases in which they were to be 'protected' from. Greyson and Gwyneth had everything to lose by this insane proposition and nothing to gain. Immunizations (an inaccurate term that leads one to believe that these vaccinations do something to safeguard our little ones against 'scary' childhood diseases) are just one great big experiment. Time and again, vaccinations have been proven by non-special interest groups to be ineffective and of greater concern still - outright dangerous with possible consequences ranging from life altering to life threatening. As a 'Mom', I declared to the children's Father and to the presiding judge that no one was going to subject my children to such a barbaric, unfounded experiment. The judge exercised his authority to rule otherwise and with the slamming of a gavel - delivered a sentence for which my children would pay dearly. Approximately 48 hours after the hideous vaccination event, I was finally able to see my children. I was overwhelmed at the sight of my two children completely dazed and suffering adverse effects such as dehydration, lethargy, dry heaves, headaches, burning eyes, sore throats and of course aching thighs with 'battle scars from where needles were drug along their tiny legs as they fought to resist the poison that was being forced upon them. Four months later, G1 and G2 (as we playfully refer to them), still show obvious signs of being compromised - especially tragic is what I witness each day in my son who is the biggest victim in this whole sick story. Greyson has been neurologically impaired as a result of being over -vaccinated and is dire need of diagnostic and remedial care. Instead of the 'System' ruling in favor of our motion requesting an "Emergency Stay' be put in place to prevent future vaccinations until I had the opportunity to get both children evaluated and treated for the injuries they had already suffered - instead what I am faced with are obstacles placed before me by the 'System' to make it nearly impossible for me to get my children medical care and worse still the sickening picture of the likelihood my children will be vaccinated AGAIN. The court, until now, has ignored the pleadings from several medical experts, such as Dr. Russell Blaylock, Dr. Mohammed Al-Bayati, Dr. Doris Rapp, Dr. Stuart Lanson and Dr. Rae - all who have testified that the odds of my two children suffering even more devastating consequences from additional vaccinations would be great and certainly a risk not worth taking. Adding to the absurdity of my family's case, in July, Greyson and Gwyneth's Father took me to court in an effort to find me in contempt for not allowing my children to leave with him on a cruise ship to some undisclosed destination off the continental US just 72 hrs. after receiving 11 vaccinations - each child still obviously struggling with the physical and emotional aftermaths of the big event. The ruling was handed down 3 months later and that indeed I was found in contempt for my decision to follow my heart, follow my good sense, follow the advise of medical experts and follow the recommendations of the CDC that suggest travel is not a prudent choice for at least 3 weeks following a child being vaccinated. This recent ruling will cost me upwards of $20,000 once all fines and fees have been paid. We are left with no choice but to appeal this decision to the Court of Appeals or above. My attorney is confident that we will prevail once a reasonable judge who knows and enforces the constitutional laws of our state hears this case. The injustices Greyson, Gwyneth, John and I have suffered - at the mercy of the 'System' - is beyond anything I could have dreamed of. Now $30,000 later (my initial attorney fees) and 4 months down the road - the picture I now look at is one of financial hardship and most importantly - a picture that includes two children who have been needlessly damaged at the hands of a judge who empowered their reckless, malice-intending Father to carry out the heinous act of forcing vaccinations on my once perfectly healthy, and carefree children with the likelihood of more to come. I know as you read this, you are thinking... Hmmm, this a sad story - my sad story - way out here in Arizona. But it's really not just mine. This same story could happen to anyone of you should someone decide to challenge your informed decision to not intentionally poison your child with childhood vaccinations. Because we have a government that is committed to keep us in the dark and control our decisions, even as it pertains to our bodies, you could one day be faced with this same dilemma only with your family member's names inserted where my family names appear today. We are laying a foundation that will allow this case to be heard in the Supreme Court of Arizona. If needed, we are prepared to go all the way to D.C. The cost of this step up to the higher courts will come at a price of approximately $50,000 to our family. More pressing on my heart today is the children's need for immediate medical attention. Dr. Rae in Dallas, Texas has agreed to examine and treat both of my children in an effort to help them recover from the damage that has already been caused and to help ward off the potential for future health-related consequences. Dr. Rae is one of only three physicians who are equipped with a special piece of machinery that can efficiently diagnose the mechanisms in my son's brain that have been damaged. This vaccination related injury prevents Greyson's pupils from constricting naturally to light. The degree of immune compromise can also be determined and the appropriate remedial measures can be put in place. Only with the financial assistance from conscious individuals like you can any of this be possible. My husband and I have made as many sacrifices as possible - we lost our vehicle during the middle of the summer and had to walk for a few weeks and found ourselves in a position having to forego food and air conditioning on many days - in order fund this war in an effort to spare our children further injury. And although we see an eventual victory on the horizon - the fight is far from over with little resources remaining. Losing is not an option for this Mom and this Stepdad! So please, if you are in a position to contribute financially to our family's case/cause, make your checks or money orders payable to Wallace R. Nichols. Also, if you prefer your donation be allocated towards the medical expenses involved in my children's aftercare, please indict so in the memo area of your check or money order. From the bottom of our hearts - Greyson, Gwyneth, John and I ... THANK YOU. In oneness - Janet Burton - Mom 480-200-6420 / 480-785-4846 Donation destination: John & Janet Burton PO Box 12042 Tempe, AZ 05284 July 12-2004
There has
been a significant and positive shift in the case wherein I, Janet Burton, along with my
husband, John, are fighting the State of Arizona and Father, Steven Hutchinson from
continuing to vaccinate our children: Gwyneth and Greyson Hutchinson, ages 5 and 7. To
those of you new to our case, my children were forcefully vaccinated with eleven vaccines
in one event and suffered mild to moderate adverse effects. Some effects are lasting.
On July 8th, 2004, a hearing was brought before the courts by Steven Hutchinson for an 'Order to Show Cause' to hold me, Mother, Janet Burton, in contempt for holding our children from boarding a cruise ship with Father just 72 hrs. after being inoculated and each child visibly showing signs of obvious adverse effects (SEE Photos). Steven Hutchinson is requesting of the Family Court that I be jailed and fined $5,000 for lost expenses and opportunity in not being able to go on the planned cruise. Our attorney, Wallace Nichols, made countless pleadings with Father's newly retained counsel to vacate the motion, as it was completely unfounded on the grounds that an individual can not seek these kinds of remedies through the Family Court. Also, Mr. Nichols explained to opposing counsel that he would never be able to sustain his burden of proof that I kept the children from traveling solely to retaliate against Father for his push to vaccinate our children against my wishes. My attorney provided Father and his attorney with a document showing Father refused to give Mother a reasonable travel itinerary, he did not have the required signed and notarized letter of consent from me to be able to board the ship to sail out of the country and pass through Canadian customs, and Father sabotaged his own trip by opting to vaccinate the children just prior to leaving on his scheduled excursion. My attorney supplied pictures and listed the names of witnesses who could and will testify as to how sick and emotionally distraught the children were following their experience of being forcefully over-vaccinated. We were confident that a shift would happen and we would gain new footing in the 'System' on the strength of our position on this and other related matters.
First came the telephonic testimony of the travel agent that booked the Alaskan cruise for Father and Gwyneth and Greyson Hutchinson. She testified that because Father's trip was heavily subsidized by an insurance company as a reward to Father for personal production, his out of pocket cost was only $1,500 - at most. She also testified that this was the first cruise she had ever booked for this particular cruise line and she did not know or make Father aware of the fact that he needed a signed, notarized letter of consent from me in order to board the ship as a single Father traveling with two small children. This is enforced and no person can board a ship that can not provide said document. Next came the, telephonic testimony of the D.O., Dr. Anthony Mannino, who over-vaccinated the children. He declared he did not administer eleven vaccines at once, his nurse did it. He obviously knew little if anything about the published risks associated with vaccinations - not even from conservative (polite reference) sources such as the CDC or the Physician's Desk Reference. He testified that throughout his 10 yrs. of practice, he has vaccinated 100's if not more patients. Of those vaccinated by him, he states that only one to two percent ever reported any adverse effect from the vaccines administered by him. He was completely oblivious to the common or rare occurring adverse effects that a child could experience following vaccinations. Dr. Mannino was reluctant to answer any questions posed to him as he appeared to be more concerned with the possibility of incriminating himself in the event he were to be sued for malfeasance in the future. Finally, Wallace Nichols was able to have much of the testimony of this "health care provider" stricken from the records as it was of no value whatsoever. Next came the telephonically appearing... Dr. Russell Blaylock, world-renowned neurospecialist and author along with Dr. Mohammed Al-Bayati, world-renowned Toxicologist/Pathologist. We first listened to the testimony of Dr. Russell Blaylock. He began by listing his accomplishments and credentials in order to have himself deemed by the courts as an expert witness. Opposing party could not object to such an assignment of title. Dr. Blaylock continued on for a full 30 minutes about the damage that was done to Gwyneth and Greyson due to being over-vaccinated with eleven vaccines at one time. The majority of his expert siting had to due with the insult of aluminum and other neurotoxins on the developing brain of a child - especially damaging at ages five and six. It made me physically sick that at one point I lost my breath, listening to him describe what has happened to my children's neurological and immune systems from such an onslaught of vaccinations. He declared eleven vaccines "unprecedented" because studies have never been done on that many vaccines administered in one event. Dr. Blaylock spoke candidly about the effects of aluminum on the brain itself and the conclusive studies that have done that are now waking up all of Europe as the United States continues to remain asleep. Though, it is also an ingredient in some of the vaccines my children received, he did not have the time to go over the neurological effects from mercury.
Dr. Blaylock made a few closing points to include that negative health conditions directly related to our children's neurological systems could continue on for a full eight years along with a new predisposition to Alzheimers disease, Parkinson's disease and MS from too much aluminum into their once pure blood streams. Also, Dr. Blaylock stated that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention states the inadvisability of travel for children who have had a much lesser amount of vaccines and that thirty days rest and careful monitoring of my children would be the reasonable and prudent thing to do prior to travel wherein emergency medical help would be limited. He also boldly replied, when asked by Wallace Nichols, that it would be highly risky to vaccinate our children again given the injuries they have already endured and that the likelihood of more catastrophic adverse effects is multiplied greatly in subsequent vaccinations given in doses two and three. "No more for these children," was the doc's order. The Judge listened intently throughout Dr. Blaylock's testimony. It was as if we were sitting in a classroom again - back in the days of college - only 100 times more intense. Everyone in the courtroom was visibly moved - including Father. He kept checking his watch as the painful testimony of Dr. Blaylock continued on, and on. The Judge reluctantly had to cut the doctor's testimony short because we ran out of time but he thanked our "expert" witness for caring enough to participate and for the wisdom he imparted to all of us in his testimony. He invited Dr. Blaylock to finish testifying tomorrow, July 15th at 2:30pm PST. Dr. Mohammed Al-Bayati patiently waited in the wings on hold for nearly an hour and a half - never getting the opportunity to offer his expert testimony on this case. He will testify next Thursday. God has richly blessed my family with people like these two gentlemen, Dr. Russell Blaylock and Dr. Mohammed Al-Bayati, who are willing to go out on a limb and help hold accountable those who choose to operate in a reckless manner that proves injurious to innocent children. My daughter, Rachel and her ex-boyfriend, both age 22, were so moved by the testimony they heard in the courtroom last week that they have committed to be there tomorrow for the continuance hearing, scheduled for two hours. Both want to contribute in any way they can to help heighten the public's awareness about the proven risks associated with childhood vaccinations. The start of a ripple effect - enough to make any Mom's heart sing! My other daughter, Rebekah, age 19, phoned me and expressed her gratitude for all I stood for and my persistence to help her younger siblings and all the children who follow after them. She closed our conversation by saying she hopes to one-day follow in my footsteps. Tears streamed down my face as I am reminded this cause is worth it for all of us and I am lucky to have the support of my family, including my new husband, my daughters, my brother and his wife, and all of you. Together we will prevail. In closing, I told my husband, John when driving home from the courthouse in our broken down car with no A/C, that I would rather be dead than carry on my heart for the rest of my life the burden that my children's Father now must carry. He can not unknow what he has come to know. No one can. Everyone left that courtroom changed - never to be silenced and never to be rendered unconscious on this issue again. One by one - we are waking up. That is what we are here for. I can't help but wonder what the Judge was thinking - knowing that he is responsible along with the doctor and Father for previously compromising the health of my children. I would be more certain that he is experiencing a level of concern or fear for himself for the consequences that will come to him professionally along with the State of Arizona for their part in the unnecessary injury they inflicted on Gwyneth and Greyson. There is no dollar amount that would come close to offsetting their experienced loss and their potential for future loss! We foresee a triumph coming up in Phoenix, Arizona. It will be a triumph for all of us that will set precedence in this country and perhaps in the world. Help us spread the message... nobody is going to rob our children of the chance to thrive - especially an ignorant and greedy government who's in bed with the pharmaceutical industry. One of the country's most respected and accomplished naturopaths has agreed to evaluate and test Gwyneth and Greyson to help move them towards recovery. He came to us at the recommendation of the famous author, Dr. Doris Rapp. We are grateful that this naturopathic doctor, new to the Tempe, Arizona area, will be taking care of the health needs of our children from this point forward. One of America's most watched television shows is in communication with us to consider running this story for the country to view. Can you imagine us sitting alongside Dr. Russell Blaylock and Dr. Mohammed Al-Bayati telling millions of parents how things REALLY are? It could be the most educational and controversial shows ever aired. It will take this kind of exposure to hold the pharmaceutical industry accountable for what they are doing to our children. With much love and gratitude, John and Janet Burton 6-21-2004 The next vital course of action for the Burton case is to get Gwenyth and Greyson evaluated. The Burtons have a LOCAL physician willing to do this for a price. $2,000. Though Dr. Al-Bayati and Dr. Blaylock have provided a statement on behalf of Gwenyth and Greyson, it's vital to have the children evaluated by a local physician. This needs to be done in order for the other things to follow: malpractice filing against the ped office which inoculated Gwenyth and Greyson. The malpractice filing is also incredibly vital to the case which has gotten unbelievably ugly. If 100 individuals could donate $10, there would be an easy $1,000 to help with the medical evaluation and legal fees. This medical evaluation needs to take place ASAP. Preferably in the 1-2 days. All Burtons ask for right now is a MINIMUM of 100 individuals to donate only $10. MANY THANKS to those of who able to help. 6-4-2004 To All Vaccination Liberation Activists, I did further research at http://www.medalerts.org/vaersdb and found that 3 of those lots administered to Gwenyth and Greyson are HOT LOTS. Gwenyth and Greyson Hutchinson were both administered the following: DTaP-Manufacturer SKB, lot# 21896A2, Date of VIS 7/30/01, Injection location: Left thigh (HOT) IPV-Manufacturer SKB, lot#21896A2, Date of VIS 1/11/00, Injection location: Left thigh (HOT) MMR-Manufacturer Merck, lot#0105N, Date of VIS 1/15/03, Injection location: Right thigh (HOT) Hib-Manufacturer Merck, lot#0341N, Date of VIS 12/16/98, Injection location; Right thigh (HOT) Hep B-Manufacturer SKB, lot#21896A2, Date of VIS 7/11/01, Injection location: left thigh Varicella-Manufacturer Merck, lot# 1151M, Date of VIS 12/16/98, Injection location: right thigh (HOT) PVC-Manufacturer Lederle, lot#495175, Date of VIS 9/3/02, Injection location: left thigh Here is what I found on those lots:
Kim: I took a quick look in some files and come up with the following: "Hot lot" vaccines are those identified as having significant adverse reactions and possibly being recalled by the manufacturer. John S. For anyone doing a hot lot search, go to: http://www.medalerts.org/vaersdb/ You'll find the following:
Hot Lot SearchesTo do a hot-lot search, CLICK HERE. A hot-lot search looks exactly the same as the above search form: it lets you find a subset of VAERS records. The difference is, once the records are identified, the system sorts all of the vaccines administered and lists the combination of vaccine, manufacturer, and manufacturer's lot number that appears the most number of times. -----Original Message----- Kimberley Haven't heard from you for a while.
I hope you have been well and are having a pleasant spring. Thank you Kimberley. This is strange,
because the website is not that of VAERS (vaers.org). I'm going to look into this. I'll
get back to you. Why would the CDC ascribe to hot lots? It's certainly not in their benefit while pushing to have as many children inoculated as possible. To submit to the concept of hot lots is to admit to the insidious flaws of the vaccine paradigm from which they profit. All one has to do is look at the record of conflict of interests these reckless employees of government and private sectors (pharmaceutical companies) have. Countless researchers consisting of physicians and even scientists who do not aspire to take part in poisoning society have written articles describing the cover ups they've found within the agency. Something Dr. Mark Geier is not afraid to mention at the Institute of Medicine (IOM) Feb 2004. Simply defined: CONFLICT OF INTEREST. Mr. Atkinson has yet to get back in touch with me on the issue of hot lots. Indeed, I continue to wait for his twisted excuse coupled with more inaccuracies that will only fall consistent to all our correspondence that began just over a year ago. "...the WHO gave as an excuse for continuing
the vaccination program, "since the vaccine caused the outbreak of polio, if we do
not vaccinate the remaining children an outbreak will occur that we cannot control."
In other words, we cause an outbreak of polio where before there were no cases and now we
need to control our outbreak. This is incredible reasoning. Dr. Blaylock
|