|
|
|
"The evidence for indicting immunisations for SIDS is circumstantial, but compelling. However, the keepers of the keys to medical-research funds are not interested in researching this very important lead to the cause of an ongoing, and possibly preventable, tragedy. Anything that implies that immunisations are not the greatest medical advance in the history of public health is ignored or ridiculed. Can you imagine the economic and political import of discovering that immunisations are killing thousands of babies?" Dr William C. Douglass, M.D. (Honored twice as America's 'Doctor of the Year') "Only after realising that routine immunisations were dangerous did I achieve a substantial drop in infant death rates. The worst vaccine of all is the whooping cough vaccine... it is responsible for a lot of deaths and for a lot of infants suffering irreversible brain damage. In susceptible infants, it knocks their immune systems about, leading to irreparable brain damage, or severe attacks or even deaths from diseases like pneumonia or gastro-enteritis and so on". Dr Kalokerinos, M.D. "It was similar with the measles vaccination. They went through Africa, South America and elsewhere, and vaccinated sick and starving children...They thought they were wiping out measles, but most of those susceptible to measles died from some other disease that they developed as a result of being vaccinated. The vaccination reduced their immune levels and acted like an infection. Many got septicaemia, gastro-enteritis, etcetera, or made their nutritional status worse and they died from malnutrition. So there were very few susceptible infants left alive to get measles. It's one way to get good statistics, kill all those that are susceptible, which is what they literally did." Dr Kalokerinos, M.D. "Crib death" was so infrequent in the pre-vaccination era that it was not even mentioned in the statistics, but it started to climb in the 1950s with the spread of mass vaccination against diseases of childhood. Harris L. Coulter, PhD. "These data show that DPT vaccination may be a generally unrecognised major cause of sudden infant and early childhood death, and that the risks of immunisation may outweigh its potential benefits. A need for re-evaluation and possible modification of current vaccination procedures is indicated by this study." William C. Torch, M.D., Director of Child Neurology, Department of Paediatrics, University of Nevada School of Medicine Fred Griffith, an army medical officer, made the first attempt to develop a vaccine against Streptococcus Pneumoniae (the lung disease, pneumonia). Though unsuccessful, his experiments lead me to believe that the risk of inoculating the human body with bacterium have been known for at at least over 8 decades. He used only two strains of the bacterium labeling them as "S" and "R". Using them in four experiments, he came up with the following results: S cells were killed by exposure to high temperature. He could only come up with one explanation. Even though heat killed the pathogenic cells, it didn't damage the chemical substance which contained the hereditary information-including the part he specified as "how to cause infection." It appeared that the substance were "liberated" from the dead cells making their way into the living cells of the harmless strain. Other experiments revealed that the living cells picked up "instructions" for causing infection permanently transforming into pathogens. What literally happened was the hundreds of generations of bacteria descended from the transformed cells were also causing infections. Here we see the infections literally causing death. Could this be the explanation of the thousands of infant deaths after inoculation?
According to Dr. Harris Coulter, a typical SIDS post-vaccination case would be when an infant acquires a "slight" bacterial or viral infection, that's been vaccinated and dies due to the infection. These cases are not classified by physicians, or anyone else who holds inquest as to the causes of accidental or suspicious deaths, as a result of an infection. Especially since vaccines are known to suppress the immune system's ability to fight. It is in this state that infants are made more vulnerable to death by infection. If infants are left alone and acquire infections without direct assault to their bloodstream, such infections would be considered harmless. Thus, most of these babies would not have died in the absence of vaccines. This was confirmed by my pediatrician when I asked him what the Pertussis symptoms of a non-vaccinated child would be. His reply, "a minor cold." He changed his tune when I said, "Well, that's what I want for my children. Just a minor Pertussis cold." CDC makes the statement that, without intervention, there is a 98.8% recovery rate from Pertussis. In his desperate attempt to discourage any confidence I have in the natural immunity of my children, he stated, "I hope you're in the 98%." A Danish physician in 1933 was first to point out the connection of the whooping-cough vaccine to the death of children. In 1946 two Americans claimed the DTP shot was responsible for the death of twins two hours after the vaccination. In 1982, Dr. William Torche, Director of Child Neurology, Department of of Pediatrics, University of Nevada, did a study on 103 children that died of SIDS. His study linked the deaths of these infants to the DPT vaccine. 6.5 percent died within 12 hours of vaccination, 13 percent within 24 hours, 26 percent within three days; 35, 61, and 70 percent within one, two and three weeks. Dr. Daniel Shannon, director of Pediatric Pulmonary Unit at the Massachusetts General Hospital, spoke at a 1979 FDA meeting on "The Relation between DPT Vaccines and Sudden Infant Death Syndrome, he described 200 infants with severe breathing difficulties after a DPT shot requiring resuscitation. Dr. Mary Megons states that the vaccination-SIDS association needs to be explored in detail because the DTP contains some toxins that make some children genetically vulnerable to Sudden Infant Death Syndrome. CDC states, "Recent reports and studies, combined with the decrease in SIDS rate despite the increase in vaccinations, support the conclusion that routine childhood vaccinations do not contribute to SIDS." Yet, there's no data on the incidence of SIDS prior to the smallpox and DPT vaccinations. Thus, how can it be known the incidence of SIDS prior to vaccination? In order for CDC's claim to have validity, there needs to be verifiable data/evidence the shows the incidence of SIDS prior to small pox and DTP vaccinations identical to the historical incidence of SIDS post-whole cell DPT vaccination. Larry J. Baraff, Wendy J Ablon, and Robert C Weiss wrote an article, "Possible Temporal Association Between Diphtheria-Tetanus Toxoid-Pertussis Vaccination and Sudden Infant Death Syndrome." for the Pediatric Infectious Diseases 2:1 [January, 1983], 7-11 issue). In their investigation study, they interviewed parents of 145 of SIDS cases in person or by phone between January 1979 and August 1980. They asked the following questions:
They found a significant excess of deaths in the first day and first week after vaccination. Another study was conducted by Alexander M. Waler, Hershel Jick, David R. Perera, Robert S. Thomas and Thomas A. Kanuss published in the American Journal of Public Heath 77:8 [August, 1987], 945-951. This supports the link between the DPT and SIDS. The authors found the SIDS mortality rate in the period of 0-3 days following DTP to be 7.3 times that in the period beginning 30 days after immunization. Doug Payne wrote an article on adverse drug events causing hundreds of infant deaths annually. (If you find the link no-longer in use, click here). "Reported Adverse Drug Events in Infants and Children Under 2 Years of Age," was published in the November issue of Pediatrics and is based on reports received by the FDA from November 1997 to December 2000. After analyzing the outcome of these reports (i.e. death, hospitalization and congenital anomaly), the highly suspected were drugs and the route of exposure which entailed direct administration or through the mother in prenatal period. There were 1,902 therapeutic drugs identified along with non-therapeutic chemicals, biological products, vaccines...etc. After overviewing the results of their study, the researchers make a profoundly careless conclusion in support of the drugs and pharmaceutical companies that adverse effects don't necessarily mean the medicine was at fault. But "these results underscore the need for additional drug testing in the youngest pediatric patients and for carefully weighing the risks versus benefits of medication. In other words, though they disliked the onset of adverse reactions caused by the experimentation they deny the potentially fatal risks and continue experimenting. In 1993, CDC did a publication on infant mortality. (You can also read it here) According to their statistics, there were a total of 33,466 deaths of which 4,669 were diagnosed as SIDS; 1,815 were diagnosed as Respiratory Distress Syndrome; 898 diagnosed as Accidents and adverse effects; and 530 diagnosed as Pneumonia and influenza. These deaths took place before these children hit the highly celebrated one year mark of their lives. According to a 1996 publication, less than 1% of adverse effects are reported due to gross under reporting. So, by CDC's words, lets take the adverse effects number and multiply that by 100 and we have 89,800 adverse effects reported among children under one years old. I am highly suspicious of the respiratory distress syndrome diagnosis as it is a common reaction to vaccines with the knowledge that the DTP alters breathing patterns in infants. In light of other mentioned articles, I'm also suspicious of the SIDS diagnosis. One would have to wonder if the respiratory distress diagnosis should be included in the SIDS category. Should the SIDS numbers also be multiplied to 100% to get a more accurate calculation? This type of data is incredibly hard to judge because of the different methods of diagnosis by countless physicians across the country. In his Article, "Why You Should Avoid Taking Vaccines", Dr. James Howenstine mentions that after the administering of the diphtheria vaccine in England and Wales, in 1894, the number of deaths from diphtheria rose by 20 percent in the subsequent 15 years. The incidence of SIDS has grown from .55 per 1,000 live births in 1953 to 12.8 per 1,00 in 1992 in Olmestead Country, Minnesota. He observed the peak incidence of SIDS at ages 2 to 4 months, as did Dr. Torche. 85% of the cases occurring in the first 6 months of a child's life. He also observed the rise of SIDS from 2.5 per 100 tin 1953 to 17.9 per 1,00 in 1992. This was occurring a period when almost every childhood disease was declining to do better sanitation practices. The increase is also at a time when childhood immunizations are raised to 36 per child. In the last diphtheria epidemic in Russia, most of the deaths were among the immunized homeless alcoholics. Dr. Geraghty, Bay Area Physician for the Study of Pertussis Vaccines states, "I'm convinced in my heart of hearts that 100 American infants a year are dying and another 250 are brain-damaged from DPT. I would be prepared to clinically defend that to scientists. Connaught Laborites is one of the manufacturers of the Pertussis vaccine. In their 1986 package insert for Pertussis vaccine, they state SIDS has occurred after the inoculation. That along with persistent inconsolable crying lasting three hours or more, unusual high-pitched screaming, collapse, convulsions...etc. They state that any of these symptoms are indicative of some degree of brain damage. Australia's Dr. Viera Scheibner, Ph.D. and her husband (an electrochemical engineer, Leif Karlsson invented a Cot Watch breathing monitor for babies diagnosed as "at risk" for SIDS or "Cot Death", which is the term used in Australia. Over a period of three years, they monitored and studied these infants. The concluded in 1988 that vaccines are the common assault to the littler vulnerable SIDS babies. Their proofs were carefully analyzed and documented and their flawless work submitted for peer review. There was no attempt to duplicate their work or alter public health policy to protect children. Instead, those of the medical community opted to protect the financial interests of vaccine manufacturers. Dr. Scheibner's work gives a strong implication that the powers that be responsible for designing and implementing immunization policies are doing so in the full knowledge that vaccines are causing the continuing rise in infant mortality every year. Vaccine advocates have absolutely no irrefutable basis for debating Dr. Scheibner's findings and lack the ability to defend their motives because popular scientific journals (i.e. The Journal of the American Medical Association, the Lancet, the New England Journal of Medicine...etc) have reports which back up her findings. It was in 1988 that the Japanese government started recommending that vaccinations be held off until children reach their second birthday. Japan saw a decline in SIDS. However, not having really learned from this, the government went back to recommending vaccinations at 3 months of age. Once again SIDS was rearing it's ugly head. Following the same type of behavior, England dropped in their vaccinations rates 30% in the 70's. As a result, a drop in the Pertussis deaths was observed. However, not learning still, England has increased the dosage and their vaccination rate. The National Vaccine Information Center conducted its own investigations in New York. They found that only one out of 40 doctor's offices confirmed reporting of death or injury following vaccinations. In other words, 97.5% vaccine related deaths and disabilities go unreported in New York every year. An obviously strong suggestion that the occurrence of vaccine induced deaths and injuries may be 10 to 100 times greater than what's actually reported in New York alone. The death toll due to vaccination is potentially catastrophic considering that New York is only one of over 50 states in the entire United States. When factoring this astounding example of under-reporting, I can't help but conclude that vaccines may be 100 times more deadly than the disease they are claimed to keep away from our children.
For Hep b vaccine there were VAERS
reports of 54 deaths per year (1990-98) For OPV vaccine there were VAERS
reports of 108 deaths per year over a 5 year period. "Since July 1990, 17,497 cases of hospitalizations, injuries and deaths in America following hepatitis B vaccination have been reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) of the U.S. government. This figure includes 146 deaths in individuals after receiving only hepatitis B vaccine without any other vaccines, including 73 deaths in children under 14 years old. In 1996 alone there were 872 serious adverse events in children under 14 years old reported to VAERS. 658 of those injuries were following hepatitis B vaccination in combination with other vaccinations and 214 of these injuries were after hepatitis B vaccination alone. In these children under 14 years old, there were 35 deaths after hepatitis B vaccination in combination and 13 deaths after hepatitis B vaccination alone, for a total of 48 deaths. Compare these statistics with the total number of hepatitis B cases nationwide reported that same year (1996) in children under 14, just 279, and the conclusion is obvious that the risks of hepatitis B vaccination far outweigh its benefits."---Incao's Hepatitis B Vaccination Testimony For smallpox vaccine from 1924-1963 it was 20 deaths per year http://www.whale.to/m/encephalitis.html
|