Dr.
Blaylock: A board certified neurosurgeon, practiced for twenty-six years, a clinical
assistant professor of neurosurgery—school of medicine for fifteen years, clinical
assistant professor of neurosurgery at University of Mississippi Medical Center for ten
years, I’ve published three books, chapters in three medical text books on various
medical subjects dealing with the nervous system, I’ve published 30 articles in
peer-review journals, and I continue to publish and write on the subject of anything that
effects the brain and my primary interest is the effect of over vaccination on brain
function.
Nichols:Doctor is those writings been subject to
peer-review?
Blaylock:Yes, all of them are in peer review journals
Nichols:And those journals are medical and scientific type
journals, correct?
Nichols:Have you reviewed recommendations that have been
authored by the Centers of Disease Control on these issues?
Blaylock:No
Nichols:In your years of practice could you give the court
an approximation of the amount of patients that you’ve dealt with in these
types of areas?
Blaylock: Well, generally what
I would see was patients who had neurological injuries from vaccinations or diseases
related to the vaccinations
Nichols:I would tender the doctor as an expert
Mark:We have no objections
Judge:Ok, we’ll accept his testimony
Mark:However, we object entirely to his testimony
Judge:Objection noted, go ahead…state your objection
Mark: relevancy…we’ve heard
this before
Judge:Objection noted
Mark: Thank-you
Judge:Go ahead
Nichols:Have you, doctor been provided knowledge of six
year old Hutchinson’s health status in this matter?
Blaylock:Briefly, yes
Nichols:And that of five year old Greyson Hutchinson?
Blaylock:To some degree, yes.
Nichols:And you’ve reviewed the subjects
children’s health information, is that correct?
Blaylock:I have not reviewed their medical information
through their medical chart
Nichols:How have you reviewed it?
Blaylock:Basically what the mother of the children provided
me.
Nichols:What did she provide you?
Blaylock:She told me about the vaccinations, how they were
done, what vaccines they received, the manufacturers of the particular vaccines and some
of the health changes that have occurred in the children following the vaccinations
Nichols:Have you reviewed the existing medical scientific
literature on the issue of giving multiple vaccinations?
Blaylock:Yes, I recently published three papers on this
issue
Nichols:Have you reviewed existing medical scientific
literature on the risks of certain diseases at these ages of five and six?
Blaylock:Yes
Nichols:Have you reached an opinion of giving multiple
vaccinations at one office visit to these type of children?
Mark:Excuse me….
Dr. Blaylock, this is Mark Cord
I represent the father in this case.Before
rendering your expert opinion in this case, I want to make it clear, did you ever
physically examine Greyson or Gwyneth, the party’s two children?
Blaylock: No
Mark:Did you eve talk to them?
Blaylock:No
Mark:So your opinions are based entirely on the reports
of their mother Mrs. Janet Burton, is that correct?
Blaylock: Well, my expertise in the area of over
vaccinations, multiple vaccinations
Mark:If relevant factors are omitted or misrepresented
to you by Mrs. Burton then your conclusions can be flawed as well, is that true?
Blaylock:Only if she misrepresented the fact that they
received at least eleven vaccinations at once or multiple vaccinations at one office
visit. That’s the pertinent point.
Mark:Do you knowbeyond
a reasonable degree of medical probability in this case that an older sister as you
described in your report had a seizure resulting from a similar vaccination?
Blaylock:I was told that by the mother as far as the
history she gave me.
Mark:You don’t know if that’s true or not?
Blaylock:No more if she came to my office and told me that
I would have to believe because that’s part of medical history
Mark:Did you examine any medical records to confirm
that alleged fact of her sister’s seizure?
Blaylock:No
Mark:No further questions
Nichols:Doctor my last question with you was have you
reviewed existing scientific medical literature on the risks of certain diseases at the
ages of these children?
Blaylock:Yes
Nichols:And have you reached an opinion regarding the
issue of giving multiple vaccinations at one office visit for these children?
Mark:Your honor I must object…
Judge:Over ruled, go ahead doctor
Blaylock:Yes, I reviewed the literature
Nichols:And you’ve reached an opinion of giving
multiple vaccinations at one office visit to these children?
Blaylock:Yes
Nichols:And have you reached an opinion regarding the
risks of the diseases vaccinated for at these ages?
Blaylock:Yes
Nichols:And did you rely on your evaluation of the
existing scientific body of knowledge in these areas in forming these opinions?
Blaylock:Yes, that and the recommendations from the Centers
for Disease Control
Nichols:Okay, what is your opinion in these regards
Blaylock:Well, according to the literature of the Centers
for Disease Control the HIB vaccination was not indicated, the Pneumococcal vaccine was
not indicated
Nichols:Were those to your knowledge administered?
Blaylock:Did I know they were administered?
Nichols:To your knowledge is it reported to you that those
vaccines were indeed administered to these children?
Blaylock:Yes
Nichols: And what is the impact
in your opinion of undertaking that type of activity?
Blaylock:Well, it put them at all the risks associated with
vaccinations, every vaccination is a risk, some of which are devastating.Death is listed as a possible complication.And there’s long-term neurological injury.It’s listed as a complication for both of
these vaccines.The HIB vaccine is known to
produce immune suppression and some literature indicates it may actually increase the risk
of developing Haemophilus influenza meningitis.So
that would be another contraindication for giving it but there’s no indication from
the medical literature or from the Centers for Disease Control for ever giving this
vaccine after age five.
Nichols:Did you develop you opinion for the court in the
area of the advisability of this type of multiple vaccinations being administered?
Blaylock:There’s no reason to give these vaccines
together or at once except for the convenience of the physician, but there’s a lot of
medical literature particularly in the area of brain injury for not doing it.Recent evidence strongly suggests that
giving that many vaccines at once can produce not only acute injury to the brain but
chronic injury to the brain.The adjuvants
that are added, particularly aluminum, there’s a literature now coming out
particularly out of France, Belgium and Germany they’ve described over two hundred
cases of macrophalgicphalitis and an associated Demyelination of the nervous system
occurring both in adults and in children.Over
sixty-six cases reported that has shown to be due to the aluminum in the vaccine.Aluminum hydroxide at the injection site acts as a
source of continued immune stimulation produces hyper stimulation and this results as a
neurological damage and this can occur as long as eight years after the injection.
Nichols:In your report doctor you discuss the notion of
excitotoxicty.Could you explain that briefly
to the court?
Blaylock:Excitotoxicity is basically the process where by
brain cells become over excited.It’s
considered to be the central mechanism of all nerve degenerative diseases, stroke brain
trauma, any sort of injury to the brain, infection, inflammation of the brain.The destructive process is the excitotoxic
process.Basically, what this does, it can
destroy the connections between the nerve cells in the brain and spinal cord. Cause the
process called dendrites to retract and if it’s intense enough it’ll destroy the
brain cells themselves.We know this is
highly correlated with aluminum and that the aluminum from these vaccines accumulates in
the brain in concentrations that can result in this.This process is associated with Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s
disease, Lou Gerhig’s Disease.Infact,
ALS has been associated with a vaccine in a child.Parkinson’s
disease has been connected to vaccines in children.And
so we have good scientific evidence of this excitotoxic process occurring with the
vaccination process.In these three articles
I review extensive neuroscience literature showing how the process works.That when you give a lot of vaccines at once,
particularly these power immune adjuvants added to each vaccine it over stimulates the
body’s immunity and that in turn stimulates the brain’s immune cell call the
microglia.When this cell is over stimulated
particularly for long periods of time it secretes two known excitotoxins: glutamate and_____ acid and this has been shown to cause the
destruction of these processes.…The
brain itself does not get infected with the HIB virus.Only the microglia stimulated.And
that produces the destruction of the brain and this is what you’re doing to varying
degrees in the vaccination process. If you over vaccinate you over stimulate this system
in the brain you begin to destroy neurons.And
the effect depends on the intensity.If
it’s a very intense effect you can get diseases like sub acute sclerosis advanced
encephalitis which occurs after the measles vaccine in which the child’s nervous
system is demialiated and has 100% mortality.On
the other end of the spectrum you can have mild behavioral changes, you can have autism,
ADD.All of these things are associated with
this process.
Nichols:As you mentioned with ADD, would hyperactivity be
an indication of adverse reaction.
Blaylock:Yes, infact, in the physician’s desk
reference and in the CDC literature these are the reactions that are listed.If you look at the MMR complications listed in the
Physician’s Desk Reference put out by the company itself adverse reactions include
numerous neurological things: encephalitis, encephalopathy, measles included by the
encephalitis, Guillain-Barre, paralysis, febral convulsions, a-febral convulsions…all
these things are listed complications of the MMR vaccine.We have similar warnings against some of the other vaccines that
unfortunately most parents are not properly informed of these complications.They’re not informed about the adjuvants and
the effects on the brain.They’re not
told that human albumin is used in these vaccines for some of them and fetal bovine serum.And that there is a risk from developing Mad Cow
Disease from these vaccines.A recent study
found that the bovine serum actually came, or significant lots of it came during the peak
of the Mad Cow crisis in England and that THAT bovine serum was used to make vaccines for
the United States.And May still be used.
Nichols:Did you receive the list of vaccines that were
administered to the subject children?
Blaylock:Yes
Nichols:And did you notice any indications from that list
of vaccines that were administered that would indicate that it was from bad lots?
Blaylock:You’d have to check with the company to look
at the lots.They have the lot numbers.But the manufacturers themselves, according
to their own vaccine contain these things.For
instance, GlaxoSmithKline DTaP contains aluminum hydroxide.
Nichols:Was that administered to these children?
Blaylock:According to this list the mother provided me.She told me she got this from the medical chart.And according to the Physician’s Desk
Reference it contains bovine extract.They
give a warning about the possibility of Mad Cow Disease being transmitted.They do not give the warnings about aluminum
hydroxide, but this is producing chronic diseases, as I said, in a large number of people
in Europe.They say it’s a growing
epidemic.So, this is a major problem.Two children have been described with this
aluminum induced syndrome, which has developed serious neurological problems.One had developmental delay the other one had
signs of neurological injury.More children
are being described in neurological literature from Denmark, Germany and France.
Nichols:Would constricted throat be an indication of
adverse reaction?
Blaylock:Because of the immune reaction…. it could
produce all sorts of problems.Constricted
throat could be an allergic reaction to some of the components in the vaccines.It’s not just the viruses or the bacteria
that’s there.Like I said, it’s
immune adjuvants.These include oils,
polysaccharides; they contain metals to stimulate the immune system.Any of these could produce system of wide array.Nausea and vomiting, is listed as one of the
problems associated with MMR.Pancreatitis,
GI gastrointestinal symptoms have been listed as complications from this vaccine.
Nichols:Dilated pupils?
Blaylock:In this report that came from the South Florida
Hospital, which was reported in the Journal of Pediatric Development Pathology.One of the children that was five years old was
given the MMR vaccine and developed pupillary reflex abnormality and signs of diffused ___
and what that means is that the ___nervous system has been injured by the vaccine process
and the aluminum…So …could produce dilated fixed pupils, hypersensitivity to
light.So that would certainly fit that
syndrome.
Nichols:Your opinion on the advisability on administering
these types of vaccines to these particular children.
Blaylock:Based on my review.Out of the vaccines.The
following four should never have been given:The
chickenpox, the HIB, the Hep B and the Pneumococcal vaccine.There’s no indication for them.The chickenpox vaccine, according to the CDC
itself, the only reason to give it is for convenience of the mother so that she won’t
miss work taking care of the child.It’s
not due to the epidemic complication problem.It’s
not due to high neurological or death rate in children.Chickenpox is a relatively begnin disease in children. So that can be eliminated.The HIB, as I said, at age five there’s no
risk of HIB infection whatsoever.The
Pneumococcal vaccine at age five, there’s no risk of Pneumococcal meningitis listed
at all.And for the Hepatitis B,
according to CDC and all the literature, the only reason they give it to children is
because it’s a captive audience.Those
with no risk are a child whose parents are not drug users or HIV infected.So that vaccine is not indicated unless
there’s a family history of drug use or of HIV infections.
Nichols:Advisability or necessity of going back and
providing booster shots once the initial round has been given.
Blaylock:I would not do it.I think it’s hazardous.If
we look at most of the really bad neurological reactions to vaccines most of them occurred
on the second or third exposure.So the
second exposure is much more likely to produce adverse effects because you’re adding
not only acute immune stimulation from the time of the vaccine but you’re adding more
aluminum hydroxide…which is going to produce a larger burdens that will last for
years producing chronic immune stimulation.There
is excellent evidence that THAT produces brain injury.In the case of autism they have shown that the MMR vaccine possibly because
of either the thimerosal or the aluminum adjuvant has been shown to produce immune
reactions to the seritonin receptors in the brain.So,
that’s been proven beyond a doubt.So,
we know that there are cases in which autism and other developmental diseases of children
can occur following vaccination.
Nichols:Doctor, given the hypothetical that these children
might have a half sibling older half sibling that experienced grand mal seizures shortly
after receiving vaccinations would that have any impact on the risk pool where these
children would fall in terms of vaccination process?
Blaylock:Well it could.It depends on the cause of the seizure in a child.If they inherited a gene from the mother that put
that child at risk to produce the seizure sensitivity it could very well also have been
inherited by these two children.And then
have put them at risk as well.
Nichols:If that occurs here and then the advisability in
your opinion of proceeding with this vaccination process?
Blaylock:I think that’d be a highly hazardous thing to
do if there’s a seizure risk.And in
every vaccine according to CDC and manufacturers that’s an absolute contraindication
of giving the vaccines.The other thing is
really important consideration is that any child that has immune deficiency in any way is
considered a contraindication to vaccination.They
are discovering now that more children have immune deficiencies that are unrecognized by
the pediatrician.And therefore they’re
at risk.So if you insist, and the court
decide that way, these children should have immune testing to make sure their immunity is
normal.Because if we know that they already
have a hyper immune response and you re-immunize them you’re almost certain to
produce neurological damage.And that’s
the general in several studies.
Nichols:In terms of taking the children on extended cruise
within forty-eight hours or seventy-two hours after the children have indicated some
tendency towards adverse reaction.What would
be the advisability of that?
Blaylock:Well, if we go by the parent’s guide to
childhood immunization, which is put out by the CDC national immunization program.For instance, on the MMR vaccine it says
(I’m reading directly from the report) febral seizures, seizures caused by fever in
cases of children who’ve gotten MMR vaccines, these usually happens within one to two
weeks after the shot…So, the warning by the CDC is that children may very well
develop a seizure as long as two weeks after they’re vaccinated.That’s with a single vaccine.When you’re vaccinating with eleven vaccines
that risk goes up many fold.
Nichols:So, you’re answer to my question the
advisability on vaccinating the children on May the 12th and then taking them
on a cruise to Alaska from Phoenix Arizona on the May the 15th.
Blaylock:I think that would be hazardous particularly with
eleven vaccines and the CDC recommending watching and waiting of a period of two weeks.They should have a minimum of two-week observation
before they leave their home base…being on a cruise ship where all you have is a
cruise ship doctor.How is he going to take
care of a major neurological anaphylactoid reaction of a child or a grand mal seizure?
Nichols:Thank-you doctor, no further questions.
Judge:Cross counsel?
Nichols:I would move simply to the adminission of exhibit
number fourteen.That is the doctor’s
report.
Judge:Did this doctor examine these children?
Nichols:This doctor made his opinions as recommendations
based upon the information that was provided him.
Judge:Your position?
Mark:Your honor, we move reserve our right to object to
the doctor’s entire testimony…
Judge:I will address the admissibility of that later
Mark:Doctor what is the percentage risk of these
children going on a cruise that they’re going to contract any seizure?
Blaylock:We don’t have a percentage because we
don’t have a study of eleven vaccinations in one child.No one’s done a study to see the risks of
such vaccinations on a child.To me eleven
vaccinesat once is almost unprecedented.So, we have an unusual case where these children
have been over vaccinated.Exposed to a very
extreme risk of neurological damage.And I
would say that their risk is much higher than a child who had one or two vaccines.
Mark:But you can’t tell us to a reasonable degree
of medical probability what that risk is, can you?
Blaylock:There is a reasonable risk.There’s no studies available. But
because these children have had eleven vaccines.Eleven
doses of very powerful immune adjuvants and the effect that we know it has on the brain
the risk is much higher.
Mark:You cannot tell us what the degree of risk is
though.
Blaylock:I can’t give you the exact percentage for the
reasons I just told you.
Mark:You can’t tell us if it’s a 90 to one,
five million to one, or one in a hundred.
Blaylock:Well, we know it’s a lot higher than that.Just from the reports that the company itself
puts out.
Mark:Let’s talk about the population that you
talked about in the past that had lethal reactions to these immunization shots.What percentage where people died?
Blaylock:Well, let’s take the hepatitis B vaccine for
instance.The study done by the National
Vaccine Information Center of reactions to the hepatitis B vaccine.They got 24,775 adverse reactions: 9,673 were
serious, 439 deaths.That was during an
eight-year period between July 1990 through October 1998.Now that’s six times higher than the national death rate from the
disease itself.200% increase death as
compared to the natural disease.
Mark:Doctor aren’t we missing one critical factor
here?That is, what was the population of
these 439 people?What was that?
Blaylock:This is the number of complications reported from
the vaccine.
Mark:How many doses of the vaccine were administered?
Blaylock:What difference does that make to the 439 people
that died?Each one of those is an
individual.Each one died.Does it matter to them that you gave this vaccine
to two million, twenty million, thirty million people? Those 439 people are dead.
Mark:I think it does and I think we have a recent
example of that it’s called the polio vaccine.How
many people were immunized for polio?And how
many people died from them?Do you know those
statistics?
Blaylock:What we found with the polio (and this occurred in
the United States and Great Britain) the death rate from polio was beginning to fall
dramatically before the population was ever vaccinated.What the vaccine people knew they took credit for.They’ve never explained why it had fallen
except for the fact that of improved sanitation, better diet, better nutrition.What happened to the vaccine was that after the
vaccine was introduced all the cases of polio were caused from the vaccine itself.Right now in Nigeria, the Nigerian people refusing
to take the vaccine from the World Health Organization because all the cases of polio in
Nigeria are caused by the vaccine itself.This
is why the vaccine was suddenly transferred from a live vaccine to a killed vaccine.That’s because they knew that over the thirty
year period every case of polio in this country was from the vaccine itself.Now children were forced to get this vaccine.They’re paralyzed.Their lives are ruined and no one took any action
for almost forty years.We also know that 98
million people in this country were infected with the SV40 virus from contaminated polio
vaccines and it is responsible for numerous brain tumors in children as well as
mesothelioma.Now, it took forty years
for the opposition to have so much evidence thrown at them that they finally admitted that
this was a carcinogenic virus, that they knew from the beginning that this vaccine was
contaminated yet they went ahead and gave 98 million children a virus that causes cancer.
Mark:So, Doctor…I forget my question.Salk is a charlotten and polio vaccination is a
hoax, is that what you’re telling us?
Blaylock:Well, all you have to do is look at the records.It’s not denied.No one is denying this information.It’s all a matter of record.
July 08, 2004