The matter having come before the Court pursuant to
hearing set on March 29, 2004, the Court having considered the arguments presented to the
Court, exhibits received into evidence as well as reviewing Arizona Revised Statutes
concerning immunization of school children as set fourth in Title 36, Chapter, Article
36-671, and the Court finding that there is a public policy of immunikzation.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Father Steven Lee
Hutchinson shall be permitted to have the children, Gwyneth Hutchinson (dob7-3-97) and
Greyson Hutchinson (dob 3-14-99), immunized by a licensed health care practitioner of his
choice. Father shall be responsible for the payment of any costs associated with the
immunization process.
DONE IN OPENT COURT: May 7,2004
L. GRANT
JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT
Copy of the foregoing mailed
April 28,2004 to:
Janet Burton
xxx
Judge made clear errors by stating his reasons to be
that of Arizona's statutory law and literally makes up translation of Arizona's statutory
exemption as only applying to circumstances in which two parents agree. This clear
misconception of an "agreement" is never implied in Arizona's statutory
immunization laws. This case had no business in the family courts. The judge
tossed all facts aside and refused Janet Burton of her legal state provided parental
right to refuse inoculation. He also admitted his reason to be based
on the numerous exhibits Janet provided in her arguments which gave evidence of statewide
child abuse by inoculations. An implication (and scientific fact!) he was not
willing to accept.
