Received 8-11-2004
SHAKEN BABY SYNDROME-Diagnostic Protocol
As a mother who went through the agony of
temporarily loosing custody of my infant son, and nearly loosing custody of him forever,
because it was wrongly claimed, he had been shaken, I understand how other similarly
charged parents’ feel and suffer. I am therefore morally obliged to do whatever is
possible to prevent this happening to other parents and carers unnecessarily.
In Australia, health workers, and others,
are legally compelled to notify authorities, such as The Department of Youth and Community
Services and the police, when there is evidence or suspicion of abuse – and this
includes what has become known as ‘shaking’.
Unfortunately, few individuals understand
the complexity of the issues involved. Often, from the beginning, a decision is made that
the ‘cause’ of the problem is ‘shaking’, and there is no need to
proceed through what should be the routine of what is known as a ‘differential
diagnosis’. This involves a consideration of all possible causes, the collection of
evidence and the performance of an array of special medical investigations.
Unfortunately this procedure is rarely
followed. Worse still, as recent cases demonstrate, prosecuting witnesses sometimes
deliberately withhold information, invent information, become extremely careless, break
many of the rules relating to the collection and interpretation of evidence – and
escape relatively unharmed when one compares their fate with the sufferings of those
falsely, or wrongly, accused and charged.
In medical journals throughout the world
the vastness of information that is pertinent to the pathologies found in so-called
‘shaken babies’ is impressive. This should be collected, carefully considered,
and made ‘compulsory reading’ for all those involved in the investigation of
cases. I have no doubt that, if this is done, justice will be served, and we will emerge
from one of the darkest pages in the history of medicine into a better understanding of
the nature of infant illnesses.
To begin, I suggest that the following
investigations be considered:
· Case history - including family history,
pregnancy, labour, birth, and continue to the time of collapse, recovery or death.
· The number of medical consultations,
including those with nurses and specialists.
· Reasons for these consultations.
· Feeding, and gastrointestinal problems,
including diarrhea
· Antibiotics administered and reasons for
why
· All medications administered, Reasons
why. Were there side effects or potential side effects? Were parents properly counselled
about this?
· All medications administered and reasons
why. Was counselling about side effects provided to the parents?
· Vaccine history including batch numbers
in case some were known to be ‘hot’ batches. That is known to have produced
excessive side effects.
· Eardrums. Inspect on admission, and
daily. If an infant dies both middle ears should be inspected during the autopsy and swabs
taken to enable tests for bacteria and viruses. At the same time, if excessive fluid is
present some should be collected and tested for endotoxin levels
· Perform and record electroencephalogram,
electrocardiogram, CT scan, MRI, brain ultrasound, Ophthalmic investigations, including
retina, Retcam (retinal photographs), head circumference (repeat daily", pupil size,
record and repeat as necessary.
· Neurological observations.
· Skeletal survey – if possible.
· Endotoxin levels in blood, and, if
prudent, in the CSF.
· Look for ‘’toxic’ strains
of gut bacteria. These produce excessive amounts of endotoxin. If an autopsy is performed
light and electron microscope studied may reveal the presence of toxic strains and the
damage done to the gut.
· Look for abnormal gut viruses
· Genetic testing of patient, parents, and
siblings.
· When ‘fractures’. exist, light
and electron microscope studies of bones, including epiphyseal and fracture areas. This is
recommended because, sometimes, fractures can be due to bone disorders related to the
effects of endotoxin and an increased utilization of Vitamin C.
· Extensive coagulation/bleeding profiles,
including (despite some difficulties) platelet functions, capillary fragility, and
bleeding time.
· Blood levels of Vitamin C and histamine
· Von Willebrand factor
· Factor x111
· Vitamin K levels.
· D-dimer levels – to the end-point.
· Liver and kidney functions
· Bruise should be carefully examined,
during life and autopsies – despite known difficulties. This includes (during
autopsies, cutting into the areas, and light and electron microscope examinations.
· Glutaric acid levels.
Some of these tests are expensive and
laboratories will need to establish the necessary facilities. The alternative is to jail
some innocent individuals for long periods and destroy their families.
If the doctors involved in the
investigation of cases do not agree to do these tests, and satisfactory reasons for such
actions are not produced, charges of negligence should be set in motion.
Parents claiming to be innocent should be
entitled to know why these tests are not being done. During the 2001 International
Conference on the Shaken Baby Syndrome, in Sydney, I asked Dr Ryan, who often gave
evidence as an expert for the prosecution, why extensive tests were not done and he
answered, in a packed lecture theatre, ‘Its too expensive’. My response was,
‘Then why are the parents and family not offered the opportunity to have these tests
performed at their own costs?’ There was no answer.
Clearly, if parents and carers are
innocent, and doctors and authorities claim that the cause of the pathologies is
‘shaking’, the only option available is to demand that tests be done.
Furthermore, if tests are not done quickly, at the time of admission, as time goes by the
presence of some causes may be absent or masked.
Despite the fact that retinal haemorrhages
alone are not necessarily diagnostic of ‘shaking’, experts have been allowed to
offer the opposite opinion without demonstrating that all other possible causes have been
eliminated. This is medical and legal lunacy. The claim that certain ‘types’ of
retinal haemorrhages are diagnostic is also a falsehood.
A personal nightmare
I was 5 months pregnant with my son, Codey,
when our daughter developed diabetes.
At the 6 months stage I was found to have
borderline gestational diabetes, and iron deficiency.
Codey’s birth-date, after an
induction, was on February 28, 2000. He was artificially fed, and then quickly developed
gut problems. His paediatrician found it necessary to change the formula 3 times in the
first 2 months.
Progress was not normal.
May 5, 2000, developed cold/flu
May 8, 2000, vaccinations – DPT,
Polio, and HIB
Mid May 2000, Nasal congestion, trouble
breathing – chest checked.
Early June 2000, Bronchiolitis and
productive cough.
Mid June 2000, Bronchiolitis, fever,
productive cough. Antibiotics administered
June 21, 2000, Back to GP, a level of
distress, concern about cry –query pneumonia, inflamed eardrums.
June 21, 2000, attends paediatrician. No
improvement on antibiotics. Chest X-ray, otitis media. For check with GP in 6 days.
Deteriorates, extremely high temperature,
crying, and severe coughing.
June 26,2000, Grand mal seizure. Admitted
to hospital.
1st admission
High temperature on arrival of ambulance.
Blood taken for tests on day of admission.
These showed a leucocytosis, reactive thrombocytosis, high platelet count, high white cell
count, and high glucose level.
Intravenous drip. Antibiotics administered
intravenously.
Panadol and painstop administered
frequently, alternatively.
Discharged June 30, 2000 – on
augmentum for 8 days. Panadol and painstop continued.
Between June 30 and July 11, continues to
have fevers, crying, back arching, little improvement. Antibiotics, panadol and painstop
continued.
June 11, 2000, taken to GP. Given the
‘4 month’ DPT/polio and HIB, DPT/polio and HIB boosters
High temperature followed, arched back,
crying. Panadol and painstop prescribed by paediatrician.
July 12, second admission. Another seizure.
Hospital records show ‘Post
vaccination febrile convulsion’.
Managed with pulmonary resuscitation, and
high flow oxygen.
Likely cause for seizure was said to be
fever - post vaccination.
At this point Codey was not weighed. An
overdose of antibiotics was administered intravenously. Next morning the consulting
physician stopped this medication.
24 hours after admission Codey was
diagnosed as a ‘shaken baby’.
Immediately, all tests were stopped. The
authorities were called in, and we began a roller coaster ride that threatened to destroy
our family.
Codey was removed to unknown foster
care. – A day we will never forget!
August 4, similar presentation to that of
July 12. Foster carer could not be located. Codey was hungry, and no formulae was
available. Codey had a rash on his back, was unsettled, crying, and had loose, green and
offensive stools.. A list of what was not done is as follows:
No blood tests
No liver tests
No ECG
No EEG
No MRI No CT scan
No brain ultrasound
No eye examination
No measurement of head circumference
No neurological monitoring
No pupil scale record
No skeletal survey
No intensive coagulation/bleeding studies.
13 months of court battles followed. Legal
fees were $150,000. The effort involved was huge. It was as if we spent 25 hours a day and
8 days every week researching the literature so that we would at least understand what was
going on in Codey’s little body. What we found was certainly not pretty. It was, in
reality, a nightmare of unbelievable proportions. The cause of what happpened? It was not
something that we had done. It was not something that that was unknown. It was ‘the
system’ that indoctrinated doctors, and others, in a way that closed all the doors to
understanding and fed poison into the minds of those who were supposed, because of their
special skills and training, to know better.
We know that Codey was never shaken.
We know that statements like, ‘Codey
was a previously well baby’, were ludicrous to the extreme.
We know that only standard
coagulation/bleeding profiles were done at admission, and never repeated.
We have reasons to believe that medical
negligence contributed to the pathologies.
We know that the diagnosing paediatrician
(who provided the evidence that was relied on for the diagnosis of ‘shaking’)
later admitted that he should have carried out extensive coagulation tests, inclusive of
testing for Factor X111 abnormalities.
The Department of Youth and Community
blamed the hospital for errors. The hospital blamed that department.
Codey is now home and reunited with our
family unit. He is safe, well, and has never been vaccinated again or prescribed
antibiotics.
Our family believes in, and praises, the
immunization schedule. However, we also believe that, for some children, immunizations can
cause a number of side effects, (as stated in the TGA records), specifically when combined
with other toxins and illnesses.
We also know that, today, as I write,
sadly, there are innocent Australian families currently caught in the system and while in
the system (ie, the Children’s Court) no-one can, and will, assist or intervene
– even though those charged are innocent. The cry of HELP falls on deaf ears. There
is no support, nowhere to turn! Hundreds of thousands of tax payer’s dollars, could
be saved if SBS diagnosing physicians took greater care. I know. I have been there!
A few weeks ago in England, news- papers
headlined, ‘Scotland Yard changes tact over suspicious baby deaths’ (Sandra
Laville, Wednesday July 14, 2004, The Guardian). I was delighted to read this, and learn
that UK authorities are progressing towards the reversal of unlawful convictions for what
was stated to be the ultimate crime – shaking a baby to death.
Wrongly accused mother like Angela
Canning’s, Sally Clark and Trupti Patel, have, at last, through the efforts of a
handful of dedicated individuals, been freed, physically and mentally, from terrible
accusations.
The English authorities have stated, in
response to criticism, that they now intend to ‘get it absolutely right, and that
these investigations are something which need expertise and particular skills’. I
quite agree!
I believe that it is possible to
shake a baby to death. I also know that, often, there are causes for the pathologies that
have nothing to do with inflicted trauma.
Bottom line
If authorities do not agree with what I
have stated, particularly because there is a huge amount of supporting literature, they
could be, and should be, regarded as being negligent. If they refuse to perform adequate
tests, not pay adequate attention to case histories, and simply farm out the problem to
individuals or organizations that are not properly qualified to handle the issues, they
should be compelled to provide reasons for such actions – or face legal actions. They
should not be allowed to wash their hands and walk away.
References:
1. Greenwald MJ, Weiss A, Oesterle CS,
Friendly DS Traumatic retinoschisis in battered babies. Ophthalmology 93(5):618-625, May
1986
2. Vanderlinden RG, Chisholm LD Vitreous
hemorrhages and sudden increased intracranial pressure. J Neurosurg. 1974 Aug;41(2):167-76
3. Tomasi LG, Rosman NP Purtscher
retinopathy in the battered child syndrome Am J Dis Child. 1975 Nov;129(11):1335-7
4. Pollack JS, Tychsen L Prevalence of
retinal hemorrhages in infants after extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Am J Ophthalmol.
1996 Mar;121(3):297-303
5. Goetting MG, Sowa B Retinal hemorrhage
after cardiopulmonary resuscitation in children: an etiologic reevaluation. Pediatrics
85(4):585-588, April 1990
6. Weedn VW, Mansour AM, Nichols MM Retinal
hemorrhage in an infant after cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Am J Forensic Med Pathol.
1990 Mar;11(1):79-82
7. Adetona N, Kramarenko W, McGavin CR.
Retinal changes in scurvy. Eye. 1994;8 ( Pt 6):709-10
8. Bloxham CA, Clough C, Beevers DG.
Retinal infarcts and haemorrhages due to scurvy. Postgrad Med J. 1990 Aug;66(778):687
9. Biousse V, Mendicino ME, Simon DJ,
Newman NJ The ophthalmology of intracranial vascular abnormalities. Am J Ophthalmol. 1998
Apr;125(4):527-44.
10. Biousse V, Newman NJ. Intracranial
vascular abnormalities. Ophthalmol Clin North Am. 2001 Mar;14(1):243-64
11. Beratis NG, Varvarigou A, Katsibris J,
Gartaganis SP Vascular retinal abnormalities in neonates of mothers who smoked during
pregnancy. J Pediatr. 2000 Jun;136(6):760-6
12. Budenz DL, Farber MG, Mirchandani HG,
Park H, Rorke LB Ocular and optic nerve hemorrhages in abused infants with intracranial
injuries. Ophthalmology. 1994 Mar;101(3):559-65
13. Weissgold DJ, Budenz DL, Hood I, Rorke
LB Ruptured vascular malformation masquerading as battered/shaken baby syndrome: a nearly
tragic mistake. Survey of Ophthalmology 39(6):509-512, May-June 1995
14. Gutman FA Evaluation of a patient with
central retinal vein occlusion Ophthalmology. 1983 May;90(5):481-3
15. Iijima H Gohdo T Imai M Tsukahara S.
Thrombin-antithrombin III complex in acute retinal vein occlusion. Am J Ophthalmol. 1998
Nov;126(5):677-82
16. Granel B Disdier P Devin F Swiader L
Riss JM Coupier L Harle JR Jouglard J Weiller PJ. Occlusion of the central retinal vein
after vaccination against viral hepatitis B with recombinant vaccines. 4 cases Presse Med.
1997 Feb 1;26(2):62-5
17. Fledelius HC. Unilateral papilloedema
after hepatitis B vaccination in a migraine patient. A case report including forensic
aspects. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1999 Dec;77(6):722-4
18. Miller E Waight P Farrington CP Andrews
N Stowe J Taylor B. Idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura and MMR vaccine. Arch Dis Child.
2001 Mar;84(3):227-9
19. Kumagai K Nishiwaki K Sato K Kitamura H
Yano K Komatsu T Shimada Y. Perioperative management of a patient with purpura fulminans
syndrome due to protein C deficiency. Can J Anaesth. 2001 Dec;48(11):1070-4
20. Russell-Eggitt IM Thompson DA Khair K
Liesner R Hann IM Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome presenting with subdural haematoma and retinal
haemorrhages in infancy. J R Soc Med. 2000 Nov;93(11):591-2
21. Marshman WE Adams GG Ohri R. Bilateral
vitreous hemorrhages in an infant with low fibrinogen levels. J AAPOS. 1999 Aug;3(4):255-6
22. Hattenbach LO Beeg T Kreuz W Zubcov A
Ophthalmic manifestation of congenital protein C deficiency. J AAPOS. 1999 Jun;3(3):188-90
23. Kaur B, Taylor D Fundus hemorrhages in
infancy. Survey of Ophthalmology 37(1):1-17, July-August 1992
24. Mei-Zahav M, Uziel Y, Raz J, Ginot N,
Wolach B, Fainmesser P Convulsions and retinal haemorrhage: should we look further? Arch
Dis Child. 2002 May;86(5):334-5
25. J. F. Geddes, R. C. Tasker, A. K.
Hackshaw, C. D. Nickols, G. G. W. Adams, H. L. Whitwell and I. Scheimberg (2003)
Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology 29, 14-22 Dural haemorrhage in non-traumatic
infant deaths: does it explain the bleeding in 'shaken baby syndrome'?
26. J. F. Geddes, J Plunkett. The evidence
base for shaken baby syndrome. We need to question the diagnostic criteria BMJ
2004;328:719-720 (27 March), doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7442.719
27. NH Thomas, JE Collins, SA Robb and RO
Robinson Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection and neurological disease Archives of Disease in
Childhood, Vol 69, 573-576
28. Caffey J. On The Theory and Practice of
Shaking Infants. Its Potential Residual Effects of Permanent Brain Damage and Mental
Retardation. Am J Dis Child 1972; 124:161-69.
29. Ganesh A, Jenny C, Geyer J, Shouldice
M, Levin AV. Retinal hemorrhages in type I osteogenesis imperfecta after minor trauma.
Ophthalmology. 2004 Jul;111(7):1428-31.
30. Berrocal AM Scott IU Flynn HW Jr
Walker-Warburg syndrome: congenital neurodysplasia and bilateral retinal folds. Ophthalmic
Surg Lasers Imaging. 2004 May-Jun;35(3):256-8.
31. Divizia MT, Priolo M, Priolo E,
Ottonello G, Baban A, Rossi A, Silengo MC, Lerone M. How wide is the ocular spectrum of
Delleman syndrome? Clin Dysmorphol. 2004 Jan;13(1):33-4.
32. Mosin IM Vasil'eva OIu Skripets PP
Iaroslavtseva EV Avuchenkova TN Iziumova EB, Shakarova EA Shuleshko OV
Neuro-ophthalmological and radiological signs of Aicardi syndrome Vestn Oftalmol. 2004
Mar-Apr;120(2):15-20.
33. Lee WB O'Halloran HS Grossfeld PD Scher
C, Jockin YM Jones C. Ocular findings in Jacobsen syndrome. J AAPOS. 2004 Apr;8(2):141-5
34. Gardner HB. Hypoxia leading to
intracranial problems may be a retinal haemorrhage. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2004
Apr;30(2):192
35. Ahmad OF Hirose T. Severe retinopathy
in a child with hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004 Mar;137(3):566-7
36. Pierre-Kahn V Roche O Dureau P Uteza Y
Renier D Pierre-Kahn A Dufier JL. Ophthalmologic findings in suspected child abuse victims
with subdural hematomas. Ophthalmology. 2003 Sep;110(9):1718-23
37. Gable EM Brandonisio TM Ocular
manifestations of Donohue's syndrome. Optom Vis Sci. 2003 May;80(5):339-43
38. Donohoe M Evidence-based medicine and
shaken baby syndrome: part I: literature review, 1966-1998 - Am J Forensic Med Pathol.
2003 Sep;24(3):239-42
39. Clemetson CA. Child abuse or Barlow's
disease? Pediatr Int. 2003 Dec;45(6):758
40. Geier MR, Geier DA Neurodevelopmental
disorders after thimerosal-containing vaccines: a brief communication. Exp Biol Med
(Maywood). 2003 Jun;228(6):660-4
41. Vahedi K, Massin P, Guichard JP,
Miocque S, Polivka M, Goutieres F, Dress D, Chapon F, Ruchoux MM, Riant F, Joutel A,
Gaudric A, Bousser MG, Tournier-Lasserve E Hereditary infantile hemiparesis retinal
arteriolar tortuosity, and leukoencephalopathy Neurology. 2003 Jan 14;60(1):57-63
42. Gaetz M. The neurophysiology of brain
injury Clinical Neurophysiology, January 2004, vol. 115, iss. 1, pp. 4-18(15)
Sent to me June 3-2004
My now 21 year old son was indicted for SBS
and because of us not having the funds to help him prove his innocense is now serving time
at Manning Correctional.
I being his parent and the grandparent of
my precious grandson need to prove his innocence to be able to continue my life. I feel as
if I have let this child down
--mama will always protect you and I
didn't.
My son and his wife had everything, a new
son, a new home, new vehicles and a life that looked so wonderful. Both of them
employed gave me the wonderful opportunity to babysit Zack every day. They were
young, both of them 18 years old,and had more than a lot of 40 year old couples.
Zack had his 6 month vaccinations on May
13th. I told my daughter-in-law that Zack's head looked as if one side were
swollen or at the time I thought it was the little bouncie seat they put him in often
misshaping his head and left it at that because she also has a mother (one who would not
let her be the mother - kept interferring with her while she was caring for Zack- one who
often remarked about wishing she could have another baby and couldn't). Zack was taken to
the doctor for cough and a rash. He was given hydrocortizone cream for the rash and
antibiotic for the cough.
The day before their lives crumbled I
stated my concerns about Zack's eye's being awfully dark underneath and him being fussy
about eating. This is an infant that was never fussy and always eating.
The next day my son had a late arrival time
for work so he was going to keep Zack and have me pick him up at about 11:00 a.m. after
taking my other children to school (also a late arrival time that day). So my
daughter-in-law left for work at approximately 8:30 a.m. about 9:15 a.m.(being a new
grandma) I called my son to see how things were going (or do I need to come on and get
Zack) and he said everything was great that he still wasn't eating regular but he had just
ate and was laying in his bouncie seat watching cartoons and daddy play on the internet,
so I said okay I'd see him about 11:00 a.m. At 10:15 a.m. I received a call from my
daughter-in-law that my son was at the hospital with Zack. I rushed over to find my son
totally distraught, he said Zack fell asleep so he placed him in his crib and went back to
his game, in approximately 15 minutes went to look in on Zack only to find him not
breathing gurgling mucus and milk and non-responsive.
Growing up in a daycare my son was fully
trained in CPR so he immediately wiped Zack's mouth and began CPR to no avail so he placed
him in his seat put him in his truck and tapping Zack's chest gently on the way to the ER
got a breath,he made the decision to take him instead of calling 911 was because he lived
within lessthan a 3 to 5 minute drive. Only to end up being accused of inflicting great
bodily harm (SBS) and now serving time. At first the DSS held any persons being around
Zack within the last 72 hours a possible to doing this then it went to 48 hours then 24
hours and then when it was revealed that my son was alone with Zack they and the physician
decided it had to be within the past hour.
This physician has been a close friend and
physician for the other grandmother for over 20 years. Since the other grandparents had
not been around him within the past 72 hours we all agreed that a safety plan placing Zack
with them would be better than foster care when he was released. We at this time still did
not know accusations of SBS were being sought, but the other grandparents knew it all.
They pushed my son being convicted to the
point of turning their own child against them because she believed in her husband and was
conversing with DSS the whole time about custody being given to them. Well my son and his
wife were ripped apart by this because the only visitation was given to my daughter-in-law
under supervision of her parents but was never supervised - just used that as an excuse to
have her move back home to be with Zack all the time and tried to persuade her to not
stand behind her husband or they would seek full custody.
The DSS also were telling her if she
testified or even showed up at his hearings they would have to be entitled to help her
parents seek full custody. These children were petrified and didn't know what to do but my
son told his wife to go to Zack that he understood. She still would go to his hearings but
never would speak.
After 2 years of a life of not seeing his
son because they heehawed every way you can imagine to keep Zack from his supervised
visits with my son and having his wife whenever she could sneak to see him and let him
know about his son, he gave up and decided that since his public defender told him he
might as well plead guilty and get it over with, the judge denied his monies for an expert
witness, and they had the one and only doctor (the family friend) testifying finally gave
up. He was also told if he was convicted or plead that when he went to jail that his wife
would regain full custody and could move back to their home with Zack.
He plead guilty and was sentenced to 7
years in jail no parole-100% serve. This is a child that has never been in any trouble,
loved by all, biggest heart in the world (gave my doberman mouth-to-mouth to save him) was
on top of the world with his new son, never away from his family at all his entire life-
always a phone call away-not to mention within a couple of miles. Now he is in a place for
wrong doers not children falsely accused. Zack had the subdural hemotoma and retinal
hemorrhaging only. No neck injury, no bruising, no fractured anything.
They tried to say it was due to babies not
bruising easily but Zack bruised from the oxygen mask in the ER. I am at my wits end
almost to the point of losing my mind literally because I feel that I should have been
able to protect him and didn't!!
Money rules the world and I don't have no
big lump sum to hire the lawyer to help but my husband and I work very hard every day and
are ready to pay the rest of our lives and then some for help and don't have the slightest
idea of where to turn. We called his public defender to discuss an appeal and she in her
own way said no, not unless we brought her the expert witness to rebut theirs. What do we
do and where do we go?
My son deserves the right to have someone
on his side that can help and he deserves the right to continue his storybook life he was
ripped from. We also as grandparents have been given any and every excuse as to why we
couldn't see Zack at our scheduled visitation to the point of we no longer get to see him.
My first born son and my first born grandchild need me and I don't know where to begin.
Please if you can be of any help I would be
indebted to you forever and nothing is too much not even my life to accomplish this. My
daughter-in-law needless to say is still having to live with her parents to be with Zack
and she has not been accused or convicted of anything. Now her parents are trying to fight
her for full custody. This girl is working 2 jobs to maintain her home and also having to
give to her parents. It is so WRONG!!!
If you can help in any way please contact
sweetpea299129@aol.com
Emailed to me May 25-2004
Our son's story WAS THIS SHAKEN BABY OR MEDICAL MALPRACTICE YOU DECIDE!!!!! He now is serving 15 years in a Florida
Prison, the real offenders continue to practice medicine and continue to do sloppy
investigations. Brian Herlihy was convicted of causing the death of Baby Robert, an infant
in his care, by violently shaking the child. None of the physicians who testified as
experts for the state reviewed the baby's prenatal and postnatal medical records to learn
about his pre-existing health problems, his treatment with corticosteroid, or his adverse
reactions to vaccines. Some of these physicians were aware that Baby Robert suffered from
chronic health conditions such as a chronic subdural bleed, brain atrophy, and sinus and
ear infections. However, they did not make any attempt to investigate the links between
the baby's chronic illnesses and his respiratory arrest on the morning of August 2, 2000.
The evidence also shows that Brian was convicted and imprisoned due to sloppy and
incomplete medical Investigations. Here is his story throughout our country and across our
shores there seems to be an increase in the persecution of innocent people. There has been
a flood of cases involving something called "Shaken Baby Syndrome. Sadly, there are
cases where children are violently abused for no reason and sometimes die as a result.
However, even more tragic is the rising numbers of cases where doctors "jump the
gun" and set in motion events that are irrevocable. This leads to police wrongful
charging, arresting, and convicting innocent people for a crime that never occurred. It
has been quite a struggle for me to be able to put what is in my heart and in my head on
paper. It has been over 3 years since my nightmare began for family as well as my friends
and me. This has cost me a lot. A lot of friends, many opportunities, and freedom. This is
because of my persecution for something I did not do. This is my story of little Robbie
and I and events in our nightmare. I first met Robbie in July of 2000. He was a happy
little boy and we first "met" when his mom asked me to feed him while she
shopped. I grabbed his bottle, held him in my arms, and watched his bottle quickly empty.
Afterwards I burped him and he spit up down the back of my shirt. His mom kept apologizing
and attempted to clean it up. It did not bother me. I asked if he spit up like that a lot
and she said "yes." I enjoyed that time with Robbie. It gave me a sense of
peace. There was not a better feeling than that. That first day with Robbie will always be
with me.
After that day, Robbie's mom asked me if I would mind watching him a few hours a day from
time to time. I worked at night; school was out, I figured why not? Robbie and I had fun!
From bath time to nap time. It was not work, it was fun time! Robbie and I went places and
he was a joy to take care of. The only time I regretted was when he was not there. Robbie
and I had our own "language." If he was happy, and he sure was, he would
"GOO." If he was unhappy, he would cry and make a sound like a "gee."
I am proud to say he was never unhappy. The day of August 2, 2000 turned all of that
upside down. Robbie and his mom showed up while I was attempting to "dip" my
puppies. I heard Robbie crying, which was unusual. He was still in the car and it was
loud. While his mom brought him in, he was still crying. She held him out and said,
"Take him." I told her what I had been doing and that I needed to wash my hands
first. When I came back, I held him and tried to soothe him. I remember asking him,
"What's wrong with my little buddy?" He was sweating pretty badly. The one-piece
jumper he had on had spit up on it and was wet. I took his clothing off and noticed red
splotches on his body. I asked his mother what she thought it was. She said, "Heat
rash, he gets it a lot." After a diaper change and a wipe down with baby wipes, he
seemed a little better. He had stopped crying. His mom said she would feed him while I
finished up with the puppies outside. When I finished, I went back inside and Robbie's mom
was in my living room. She wanted my keys so she could fill up my truck so we could go on
a day trip to Cedar Key. As she left, her instructions were for me to shower and be ready
to leave when she returned. When I asked about Robbie, she said, "Robbie will be
fine, now go." I went to my bathroom and turned on the water, realizing I had no hot
water. I turned it off and used the bathroom. Then I came out and saw Robbie. When I had
Robbie in my care I would place him in the center of the bed, surrounded by pillows and I
would not leave him alone Today, his mother told me to take my shower, and when I asked
what about Robbie, she said "Robbie will be fine" He was not "fine"
when I found him. All I could see was his little feet sticking out and pointing up. He had
been wedged between the mattress and footboard. When I went to pull him out I saw formula
coming out of his nose and mouth. He was not crying and his eyes were barely open. I said,
"Robbie, are you okay?" His body went limp and he made a terrible sound. I gave
him two quick "puffs" when I saw he was not breathing. I checked for his pulse
and ran to get my phone to call 911. 911 stayed on the line with me while help was on the
way. I remember saying "Baby! Please don't die!" It was the most horrible thing
in my life. I continued to help Robbie breathe until the medics arrived. I was pulled from
the room while they worked on him. I broke down and was very upset. What had happened? I
did not know. After several more minutes, more rescue personnel showed up. One of them sat
me down and tried to calm me down. It was not working. All I wanted to know was how Robbie
was doing and what was going on. His mom showed up after a while and I told her what I
knew. I was more upset than she was. I told her I felt I let Robbie and her down because I
could not help him. I tried to help; it just did not seem to matter. As they were leaving
with Robbie they told me, he was breathing on his own and was awake. We followed the
ambulance to the hospital, which was less than a mile away. When we got there, we spoke to
the doctors and finally we were allowed to see him. I will never forget when I placed my
finger on his little hand. He gripped it and looked right at me. My heart was breaking.
The doctor said it was a seizure and that Robbie would be fine. Sadly, it was not true.
When the police arrived the first time, they were sympathetic to our situation. They had
u!
nderstood this was an accident and offered their help. If they were not doctors, then how
could they help? Only after Robbie's CT scans and Robbie's own mother giving five separate
stories did suspicions arise. What was odd was they were listening to someone who was not
even there! Only later did I realize her 10-minute errand lasted for r 45 minutes. Then
the police would not let me go anywhere until the detectives came back. These same people
had offered their help less than an hour ago. Now they were looking at me as a suspect and
I was speechless at what was going on. I was interrogated and threatened over the course
of four hours. They had searched my place and car. Why? I was not hiding anything. There
had been a promise to keep me updated on Robbie's condition, and that was not honored.
After all of this I was finally allowed to go home but not allowed to go to the hospital.
The next evening I was arrested at gunpoint and charged with aggravated child abuse. On
August 10, 2000 Robbie died at 12:52 in the morning. I was then charged with felony
murder. I was indicted on August 29, 2000 for first-degree murder. I did not know many
things about Robbie; much less his mother. I know them now and am still amazed at how this
all has happened. Since this all happened, there are just a few things that have been
discovered: Robbie was 4-5 weeks premature and was a breach delivery. He also suffered a
broken clavicle at birth. His mother had been in two separate car accidents that resulted
in hospitalization while pregnant with Robbie. The second accident caused her to go into
pre-term labor and was stopped. She had been instructed to stay on bed rest the rest of
her pregnancy by her doctor. However, she went back to work against medical advice.
Robbie's lungs were very immature at birth and he was exposed to steroids to promote this
growth.
At Robbie's 3-month "healthy baby" check-up, it is noted that his neck muscles
were underdeveloped. No one but his mother knew about this. Not even Robbie's father or
other family members. On May 9, 2000 Robbie received the following vaccines: DTAP:
by SKB Lot Number 918A2 (now a HOT LOT), IVP by Connaught RO668 (now a HOT LOT).
Hep B by SKB Lot Number 3198A2 (now a
HOT LOT), HIB by Connaught UA510AA (now a HOT LOT) Robbie received the following vaccines on 7/19/2000. DTAP by SKB Lot
Number 95682 (now a HOT Lot), OPV Connaught R1433 (now a HOT LOT),
Hep B by SKB Lot Number 3198A2 (now a
HOT LOT and the same lot that was
administered on 5/9/00) and the last was HIB by Lederle Lot Number 468487 (now a HOT LOT) Robbie had a
chronic subdural hematoma that the radiologists at the hospital determined to be at least
a month old. They also felt it could be the result of birth trauma.
There was no MRI performed because Dr. D felt "there wasn't a need to spend $1,000 to
confirm what I already knew." Dr. D is not a radiologist or a neurologist. This was
also after the radiologists told her of their findings.Robbie had developed severe
untreated diabetes.
Robbie was diagnosed with sinus-ethmoids disease. It had been reported by family members
that Robbie seemed to always have the snuffles. · Robbie had a tracking problem as noted
in his chart by his pediatrician in relation to his eyes. There was also evidence of
glaucoma found. Robbie suffered no bruising in his neck area. This would be present had he
been shaken as they claimed. There was not a single mark on his body to even suggest that
Robbie had been shaken. There were no bruises or red marks. It has been discovered that
Robbie's mother threw Robbie onto a bed during an argument with his father. The police had
also been to the residence numerous times for domestic problems. Yet, no one investigated
or charged anyone else. Robbie's thalamus was the size of a 12 year old. The thalamus is
supposed to get smaller as we age. It organizes sensory messages to and from the higher
levels of the brain. In addition, Robbie's immune system was virtually non-existent. No
doubt, his exposure to "hot lots" did not help.
The State's theory was this: I was feeding Robbie and he spit up on a new shirt. I then
became enraged at him and shook him. After realizing what happened, I allegedly conjured
up a story and called 911.
Well, their theory would be completely wrong. Even their own witnesses put holes in it.
First, they knew from Robbie's own mother that she fed him and she burped him while I was
outside. Second, both Robbie's mother and members of the rescue squad testified at no time
was I wearing a shirt. The rescue personnel even said he handed me a shirt before leaving
for the hospital. I later was told the reason I was charged is that I was the last person
to be with Robbie. Even though there was never any evidence of me being abusive towards
him or any other child. Robbie's mother even said I was very loving and caring to Robbie
yet here, I am in prison. It made no difference that 911 were called less than 10 minutes
after his mom left. The doctors failed to thoroughly look at him and his medical history.
No other tests were done to rule out anything but "SBS." I did not do what I was
accused of and am still fighting for vindication. I loved my "little buddy"
Robbie. He was not my son !
but I cared for him as if he were.
In closing, I know that God and Robbie knew I did nothing wrong. Robbie got sick and
stopped breathing and I helped him. Because of that, I am in prison. I miss him, as I am
sure many people do. I am paying for a mistake made by a bunch of overzealous and
negligent doctors. They should have treated him instead of "waiting it out." If
there is any negligence, it is on those who were in charge of his treatment here are many
thanks to many people. My mom and dad, who have been there from the beginning and still,
support my innocence. Dr. P, who believes in my innocence and proved it during my trial.
He has been a vital part of this case. Dr. U, I cannot put into words the gratitude for
all he has done. You too have believed in me. DR. VS. words are not enough to thank you
for what you have done for others and me. Dr. A-B, a man who has taken on a large task and
has uncovered things that promises to blow this wide open. Dr. B, your work has helped
open up the eyes that once were!
shut. The Vaccine Adverse Effects Reporting System (VAERS). Without it, people would
have no idea how widespread the vaccine "hot lot" epidemic really is.
I have a responsibility to prescribe a regimen of treatment for the good of patient
according to my ability and my judgment and never do harm to anyone." - Taken from
the Oath of Hippocrates
Lois
Analysis of Causes That Led to Baby Robert
Benjamin Quirello’s Respiratory Arrest and Death in August of 2000
