wpe2A.jpg (34148 bytes)

wpe51.jpg (1121 bytes) wpe50.jpg (1092 bytes) wpe52.jpg (1143 bytes) wpe53.jpg (1142 bytes) wpe1B.jpg (1204 bytes) wpe5D.jpg (1107 bytes) wpe1D.jpg (1120 bytes) wpe5C.jpg (1116 bytes)  wpe57.jpg (1158 bytes) wpe54.jpg (1085 bytes) wpe55.jpg (1102 bytes) wpe56.jpg (1157 bytes) wpe58.jpg (1157 bytes) wpe5F.jpg (1205 bytes) wpe59.jpg (1223 bytes) wpe5E.jpg (1146 bytes) wpe5A.jpg (1225 bytes) wpe5B.jpg (1221 bytes)  wpe5D.jpg (1171 bytes)  wpe3E.jpg (1089 bytes)

 

wpe53.jpg (16119 bytes)

Hepatitis B continued

May 1999, Patti White, a registered professional nurse and the district health services coordinator for a multi-school district, wrote to the Subcommittee on Criminal Justice, Drug Policy, and Human Resources of the Committee on Government Reform, U.S. House of Representatives.   She wrote on behalf of school nurses in her district about their concerns:

For the past three or four years our school districts have noted a significant increase in the number of children entering school with developmental disorders, learning disabilities, attention deficit disorders and/or serious chronic illness such as diabetes, asthma and seizure disorders.  Each of the past four years has been worse than the year before.   There is only one common thread we have been able to identify in these children: they are the children who received the first trial hepatitis B injections as newborns in the early 1990s. 

As the hepatitis B compliance rate in newborns has gone up in our community, so has the percentage of damaged children.  This is very alarming.  Because of having so many damaged children we have tried to find the long term clinical trials that ruled this vaccine “safe and effective”.  We discovered through an exhaustive Medline search that the FDA based its decision to approve hepatitis B vaccine for administration in the first hours of a newborn baby’s life upon clinical trials and upon post-marketing surveillance studies in which patients and their doctors were asked to report any adverse effects they noticed within 4-5 days after each injection [4 days for SmithKline and 5 days for Merck]. 

The problems being reported in increasing numbers as occurring after hepatitis B vaccination appear to be autoimmune and neurological in origin.  Such problems take weeks to months to produce noticeable symptoms, and cannot be spotted in a 4-5 day observation period.   These are the only clinical studies that have been done by Merck or SmithKline.   There is not one long-term study that we could find. 

The CDC and FDA have no idea what the long term effects will be on the newly developing neurological and immune systems of the infants who are injected with this vaccine.  They seem to only be concerned with denying the connection between these damaged children and the hepatitis B shot they received within a few hours of birth.  The CDC even admits the lack of study and states they do not even know how long the vaccine will be effective.   We found this amazing since the vaccine was developed for a population at risk for hepatitis B: IV drug users, high risk medical professionals and those who are involved in high risk sexual practices. 

In 1950 (before mass immunizations began), the USA had the third lowest infant mortality rate in the world.  By 1986, the USA dropped to 17th place.  In 1995 the USA dropped to 23rd and now the USA has dropped to the appalling position of 24th in the health of its children.  But the USA is now first in vaccine compliance through government mandates.  (Update: The latest report reveals that the United States has dropped to 31st in the world in the health of its children).  See the Unicef report.

The elementary grades are overwhelmed with children who have symptoms of neurological and/or immune system damage: epilepsy, seizure disorders, various kinds of palsies, autism, mental retardation, learning disabilities, juvenile-onset diabetes, asthma, vision /hearing loss, and a multitude of new conduct/behavior disorders. 

We have come to believe the hepatitis B vaccine is an assault on a newborns developing neurological and immune system.  Vaccines are supposed to be making us healthier, however, in twenty-five years of nursing I have never seen so many damaged, sick kids.  Something very, very wrong is happening to our children.  The census of ill children treated in our health rooms each day has increased by 300% in only four years. 

In our last central district school nurse meeting we discussed whether the combination of so many viruses all at one time (hepatitis B vaccine commonly given at the same time of the DTaP, IPV, HiB, PCV, Var and MMR) is causing the infants immune system to be overwhelmed and unable to mount a sufficient defense response.  We are advocating clinical studies to determine: Is the combination of all these viruses at one time an assault on an infant’s immune and neurological system that increases the chances for adverse reaction AND what are the long-term neurological and immune system responses to these vaccines.  We are all continuing to research this issue and will be happy to share the many resources we have found with you.  I hope you will do the same as you open up this issue. 

wpe3D.jpg (10887 bytes)We have talked many times about the possible cause(s) of the continuing increase in pervasive developmental disorders (PDD), such as autism.  From the literature we have found, we should expect a rate for PDD of about 2-5 in 10,000.  In our community the rate in 1st and 2nd grade is about 1 in 150 and in kindergarten, 1 in 100. 

As school nurses, we have had many parents calling and asking how they can exempt their children from the hepatitis B vaccination (HBV).  Many of them have spent long hours in study and research perplexed over this issue.  For the past six months we have been studying documents, books and research articles published by internationally respected doctors and scientists that cause us grave concern.  You must understand that we began this study to reassure our parents and show them the truth about how safe vaccines are. 

Unfortunately, our sincere, honest, dedicated study has caused a complete reversal of our once strongly held beliefs.  Instead of being able to reassure the parents, we have found ourselves being drawn deeper and deeper into this unbelievable controversy over vaccines that is raging among physicians, scientists, researchers, parents, and the government.  We pray you will have the courage to shine the light on this controversy through these hepatitis B hearings. 

My daughter’s own experience with the hepatitis B vaccine made me much more open-minded to the information we have been receiving from parents, teachers and other nurses in our community.  I personally have had to research this on my own to determine if I have been enforcing a policy that is actually harming more children than it will ever help.   I have spent countless hours reading books, vaccine-hearing testimony, research papers, medical journal articles and Internet web-sites from around the world.  I did not come to my decision easily or lightly, I assure you.  Twenty-five years of total belief in something does not shake that easily. 

I have repeated the well-rehearsed refrain “Be Wise; Immunize” thousands of times during those years and reassured countless parents that they were doing the right thing by vaccinating their precious children . . . even the ones who came to me with serious doubts and reservations.  I will now have to live with that. 

We are all now faced with a moral dilemma: will we protect the “sacred cow of conventional vaccine philosophy” or will we stand up and speak out for the “health and well being of innocent children”?  We choose children.  We wonder, which will our government choose? 

Because the hepatitis B vaccine was developed for those at risk of disease, including IV drug users and sexually promiscuous individuals, efforts to require administration of the vaccine to most, if not all of the U.S. population is very controversial.  The increasing number of adverse reaction reports connected with this vaccine exacerbates the controversy.   The controversy stems to a great extent from our lack of understanding of the mechanisms of the immune response to the hepatitis B surface antigen and lack of long term follow-up of individuals who have received the vaccine.  In a January 27, 1999 press release, the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) released figures which show that the number of hepatitis B vaccine-associated serious adverse event and death reports in American children under the age of 14 outnumber the reported cases of hepatitis B disease.  

During our research we discovered a copy of the grant proposal submitted recently to the National Institute of Health by Dr. B. S. Dunbar, who has worked in autoimmunity and vaccine development for over twenty years and was honored two years ago by the National Institute of Health.  Dr. Dunbar is working with a team of veteran vaccine researchers from all over the world.  Their grant is requested for the purpose of studying the hypothesis that: hepatitis B recombinant vaccine does cause adverse autoimmune reactions in genetically susceptible individuals.  This study will also provide new insights into the predictability of determining adverse side effects of the hepatitis B vaccine in individuals at risk as related to their histocompatability subtypes.  Their study of auto-immune diseases/symptoms caused by the hepatitis B vaccine include: lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, vascular disorders, Guillain Barre syndrome, demyelinating disorders such as optic neuritis (blindness), Bell’s palsy, demyelinating neuropathy (multiple developmental disorders), multiple sclerosis, diabetes mellitus and chronic fatigue syndrome to mention the most common. 

This group of internationally respected vaccine researchers headed up by Dr. Dunbar also point out that, “The studies (for the approval of HPB) were not designed to assess serious, rare adverse events; the total number of recipients were too small; and the follow-up was too short to detect rare or delayed, serious, adverse reactions.” Finally they point out that “overall the number of examples of adverse neurologic outcomes following receipt of hepatitis B vaccine are of concern, particularly those resulting in demyelinating neurologic disease.”

They continue, “In view of these observations. . . it is medically crucial to evaluate the nature of the autoimmune reactions (i.e. risks) associated with the hepatitis B vaccine and to determine if individuals who will have these adverse reactions can be identified in advance of receiving the vaccine”.  There are critical questions that must be addressed to establish the risk/benefit of the current hepatitis B vaccines in the United States.  These questions are particularly important in view of recent mandates to vaccinate all children including newborn infants.”

You may read the text of Dr. Dunbar’s grant proposal here.

Many groups have called for a moratorium on hepatitis B vaccination until some of these questions can be answered adequately.  The NVIC reported “Newborn babies are dying shortly after their shots and their deaths are being written off as sudden infant death syndrome.   Parents should have the right to give their informed consent to vaccination and Congress should give emergency, priority funding to independent scientists, who can take an unbiased look at this vaccine, instead of leaving the search for truth in the hands of government officials who have already decided to force every child to get the vaccine”.   We agree completely.  The NVIC can be contacted for further information. 

In Dr. Coulter’s book, “Vaccination, Social Violence, and Criminality” the thesis is developed that the “sociopathic personality” which has emerged on a mass scale in recent decades, and which is responsible for a disproportionate amount of crime and violence, is causally linked to the childhood vaccination program.  Vaccination frequently causes encephalitis and neuropathy that in turn leads to these post-encephalitic states and conditions.  In his book, Dr. Coulter presents a time line of increase in developmental disability related to vaccine introduction that is indeed frightening.  Dr. Coulter believes about 20% of our children are suffering from this neurological vaccine damage. 

Our own school district’s confidential health statistics show at least 20% of our children (K-3) have significant neurological damage and/or chronic illness.  The last three years have shown acceleration in the numbers of children who are entering our schools with these “developmental disorders”.  (Could these be the same infants who received the first trial doses of hepatitis B as only a few hour-old newborns?) As school nurses, working with these damaged children on a daily basis, we pray this is not true.   If it is, the ramification to this generation of children is unthinkable!

Should we not pause, call for a moratorium on these poorly tested, rapidly approved vaccines, and allow independent American physicians and researchers to study them before blindly injecting an experimental vaccine into an entire generation?  (We have found the only ones declaring the vaccine’s safety are the ones who are making millions of dollars from its sales, whose employment depends on it or the ones being supported by the drug companies’ vast number of grants and fundings.  The independent researchers seem to be coming up with an entirely different report.)

Vaccine producers have nothing to lose since our U.S. Congress has made them immune from responsibility or liability for injuries caused from their vaccines.  The push is on for them to create more and more vaccines.  There are huge amounts of money being made by these people who no longer worry about the consequences of their inadequate clinical trials.  The United States government has had to pay out over a billion dollars in damages to families who can prove their children have been damaged or killed by vaccines, and there are thousands more cases pending. 

We believe, as medical professionals, that we are doing a great disservice to our country by forcing government mandated vaccines on all children.  Please research this and we pray you have the courage to speak out and tell the nation what you find.  (These are the personal beliefs of the school nurses and do not necessarily reflect those of the school district.)

Read correspondence with Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) as I question it's national recommendation for every infant.

Hi,

If hepatitis B is only a sexually transmitted diseases, why is it mandated for all newborns?

Hepatitis B is NOT just a sexually transmitted disease. It is very easily transmitted from an infected woman to her infant at the time of birth. In the recent past as many as 10,000 infants were infected in this manner every year. Up to 90% of these infected infants will be come chronic, lifelong carriers of the virus, and up to a third will dies as a direct result of the infection. We have no tolerance for infection of infants with hepatitis B virus, which is why we recommend the vaccine for every child at the time of birth.
Okay.....yet, not ALL   mothers are infected.  It still doesn't give grounds for mandating the vaccine for ALL newborns.   It would make sense to only mandate it for newborns of the infected mother.  I am not infected, why should I allow the vaccine to be given to my newborn at birth?
No level of transmission to infants is acceptable. Despite our best efforts, errors are made (lab tests are misinterpreted, the wrong test is ordered or reported, etc). This is why we recommend all infants be vaccinated at birth.
... 2-3 MILLION babies are born each year.  Right?  So, for the sake of argument.....10,000 infected infants out of 2 million....that's only 0.05% of infants....is that truly enough to encourage a mandate for ALL infants?  Why shouldn't the other 99.95% healthy infants be left alone?  What's the chances of the other 99.95% having been given the wrong diagnosis because of misenterpreted or   misreported lab tests?  I am not infected, and probably never will be because my husband has been my one and only "sex partner" EVER...and I don't take the chances of using contaminated needles because I don't shoot illegal drugs into my system.  What's the chances of my unborn child to be infected?  Seems to me like....none.  With that in mind (along with only 0.03-0.05% of infants being infected) I am not convinced that I should allow my unborn child to be vaccinated at birth.
No one will force your infant to have the birth dose. It is your choice. Beyond perinatal transmission, the child's risk is not zero. There are more than 1 million chronic carriers of hepatitis B virus in this country. Most do no know they are carriers. Many are children, who could be in the same day care or school as your child.

I am happy that you have no risk factors for hepatitis B infection. I am sad that you have such a callous attitude about the thousands of infants that will become infected this year. Every infant who becomes chronically infected is a human tragedy. We will continue to do what ever is necessary to prevent this from happening.

So, if my child were to play in the same room with an infected child....my child could become infected?  I thought it was only by 1-having unprotected sex 2-sharing needles when injecting illegal drugs 3-being stuck with a used needle on the job or by an infected mother giving it to her child as clearly stated on your site: www.cdc.gov/nip/publicationsVIS/vis-hep-b.pdf   Is there another way that this disease is transmitted that the public is not aware of?

My heart goes out to the less than 1% babies infected with Hepatitis B.   I see this as a horrifying tragedy for the babies and their parents.  However, why can't the other infants born to uninfected parents be left alone and not be vaccinated?  Does CDC have fears concerning hepatitis B that encourages the need to vaccinate as many other healthy newborns as possible....that maybe we, the public, should know about....and, therefore, see reason to go ahead with the vaccination?

Thanks so much for being generous with your time.

The virus is transmitted by contact with the blood or body fluids of an infected person. Some infected people have very large amounts of virus in their blood, so contact with a small amount of blood is sufficient to transmit. While sex and injection drugs are the most common, there are many cases of hepatitis B that do not have these risk factors, which implies the person had contact with a trivial amount of blood, but enough to become infected. Further, living in a household with a nonsexual contact increases the risk of infection.

We encourage universal vaccination of infants because it does not harm a child whose is not exposed, and provides an enormous benefit to those who are. You may feel confident about your lack of risk factors, but thousands of infants are born to women who are not as certain. It if for these infants, and because errors occur when relying heavily on laboratory results, that recommendation vaccination starting at birth

Wow, very interesting....just exactly how is it that living in a household with a nonsexual contact increases the risk of infection?  This to me appears to be a mistry since you have never made mention of this in previous emails. Does that mean that even though my husband and I don't conduct extra marital affairs, that somehow my child will still contract hepatitis B....that it just "appears" in our home and infects my newborn?  How exactly does that happen and exactly how is the risk increased? Is the vaccine is 100% effective?

Thanks for your time and (hopefully) another reply for the sake of my concern on this disease

Transmission presumably occurs as a result of exposure to minute amounts of virus through body fluids (think about sharing razors, tooth brushes, eating utensils). Hepatitis B virus doesn’t just appear. It must be transmitted from person to person through body fluids. In day care and school settings, children can be exposed to body fluids in various ways, such as chewing on the same toys as a virus carrier, exposure to blood through injuries, sports, “playing”, etc. If you are not infected, the risk to your child is very low until he or she begins to come into contact with other children. Why even risk infection? You have enough other things to worry about without some kid bleeding on your child at school. No vaccine is 100% effective, but hepatitis B vaccine is pretty close. More than 95% of recipients will be protected for many years after completing the series.
Oh, thank you for that clarification on there being no thimerosal in the hep B vaccine.  I've learned so much in corresponding with you about the vaccine and the risks of getting the virus.  Without lacking simpathy to the 0.05% infected, I am now even more convinced that keeping my child free of the hep B vaccine does not put her in a horrific level of risk or danger of contracting the disease from her healthy home environment.  Should I feel the need to vaccinate her, I will wait another 5 years for when her immune system is so much stronger to withstand the affects of the other added chemicals.
There has been no further correspondence on the vaccine and there IS thimerosal in the vaccine according to the package insert I found at the time.  This correspondence took place  Sept 2003

                                     wpe47.jpg (1734 bytes)wpe48.jpg (2103 bytes)wpe49.jpg (1648 bytes)